public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: add smt_gain
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:21:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903132212.410690005@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090903132145.482814810@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-1b.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1916 bytes --]

The idea is that multi-threading a core yields more work capacity than
a single thread, provide a way to express a static gain for threads.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 include/linux/sched.h    |    1 +
 include/linux/topology.h |    1 +
 kernel/sched.c           |    8 +++++++-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -930,6 +930,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
 	unsigned int newidle_idx;
 	unsigned int wake_idx;
 	unsigned int forkexec_idx;
+	unsigned int smt_gain;
 	int flags;			/* See SD_* */
 	enum sched_domain_level level;
 
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/topology.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
 				| SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER,	\
 	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
 	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
+	.smt_gain		= 1178,	/* 15% */	\
 }
 #endif
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8490,9 +8490,15 @@ static void init_sched_groups_power(int 
 		weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
 		/*
 		 * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
+		 * Usually multiple threads get a better yield out of
+		 * that one core than a single thread would have,
+		 * reflect that in sd->smt_gain.
 		 */
-		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
+		if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1) {
+			power *= sd->smt_gain;
 			power /= weight;
+			power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
+		}
 		sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
 		return;
 	}

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-03 13:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] load-balancing and cpu_power -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  9:19   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04  9:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  9:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04  9:34         ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 14:22         ` Dave Jones
2009-09-04 14:42           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 17:45             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: provide arch_scale_freq_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090903132212.410690005@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox