From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code.
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:21:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903132213.006719409@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090903132145.482814810@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-9.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3966 bytes --]
Move some of the aperf/mperf code out from the cpufreq driver thingy
so that other people can enjoy it too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 12 ++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 41 +++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -1000,4 +1000,16 @@ extern void start_thread(struct pt_regs
extern int get_tsc_mode(unsigned long adr);
extern int set_tsc_mode(unsigned int val);
+struct aperfmperf {
+ u64 aperf, mperf;
+};
+
+static inline void get_aperfmperf(struct aperfmperf *am)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF));
+
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, am->aperf);
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, am->mperf);
+}
+
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -243,23 +243,12 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpum
return cmd.val;
}
-struct perf_pair {
- union {
- struct {
- u32 lo;
- u32 hi;
- } split;
- u64 whole;
- } aperf, mperf;
-};
-
/* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
{
- struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
+ struct aperfmperf *am = _cur;
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
- rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
+ get_aperfmperf(am);
}
/*
@@ -278,19 +267,17 @@ static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void
static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct perf_pair readin, cur;
+ struct aperfmperf readin, cur;
unsigned int perf_percent;
unsigned int retval;
if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
return 0;
- cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
- per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
- cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
- per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
- per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
- per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
+ cur.aperf = readin.aperf - per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
+ cur.mperf = readin.mperf - per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf;
+ per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf;
#ifdef __i386__
/*
@@ -305,8 +292,8 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
shift_count = fls(h);
- cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf >>= shift_count;
}
if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
@@ -321,14 +308,14 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(st
perf_percent = 0;
#else
- if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
+ if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf)) {
int shift_count = 7;
- cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
- cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
+ cur.aperf >>= shift_count;
+ cur.mperf >>= shift_count;
}
- if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
- perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
+ if (cur.aperf && cur.mperf)
+ perf_percent = (cur.aperf * 100) / cur.mperf;
else
perf_percent = 0;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 13:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] load-balancing and cpu_power -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-04 9:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:34 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 14:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-09-04 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: provide arch_scale_freq_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903132213.006719409@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox