From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 14/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:21:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903132213.413056069@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090903132145.482814810@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-13.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2694 bytes --]
A more readable version, with a few differences:
- don't check against the root domain, but instead check
SD_LOAD_BALANCE
- don't re-iterate the cpus already iterated on the previous SD
- use rcu_read_lock() around the sd iteration
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1053,15 +1053,10 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *r
* not idle and an idle cpu is available. The span of cpus to
* search starts with cpus closest then further out as needed,
* so we always favor a closer, idle cpu.
- * Domains may include CPUs that are not usable for migration,
- * hence we need to mask them out (rq->rd->online)
*
* Returns the CPU we should wake onto.
*/
#if defined(ARCH_HAS_SCHED_WAKE_IDLE)
-
-#define cpu_rd_active(cpu, rq) cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->online)
-
/*
* At POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP level, if both this_cpu and prev_cpu
* are idle and this is not a kernel thread and this task's affinity
@@ -1099,7 +1094,7 @@ static int wake_idle_power_save(int cpu,
static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
- struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_domain *sd, *child = NULL;
int i;
i = wake_idle_power_save(cpu, p);
@@ -1118,24 +1113,34 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct tas
if (idle_cpu(cpu) || cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.nr_running > 1)
return cpu;
+ rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
- if ((sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE)
- || ((sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR)
- && !task_hot(p, task_rq->clock, sd))) {
- for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd),
- &p->cpus_allowed) {
- if (cpu_rd_active(i, task_rq) && idle_cpu(i)) {
- if (i != task_cpu(p)) {
- schedstat_inc(p,
- se.nr_wakeups_idle);
- }
- return i;
- }
- }
- } else {
+ if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
break;
+
+ if (!(sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE) &&
+ (task_hot(p, task_rq->clock, sd) || !(sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR)))
+ break;
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), &p->cpus_allowed) {
+ if (child && cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(child)))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!idle_cpu(i))
+ continue;
+
+ if (task_cpu(p) != i)
+ schedstat_inc(p, se.nr_wakeups_idle);
+
+ cpu = i;
+ goto unlock;
}
+
+ child = sd;
}
+unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return cpu;
}
#else /* !ARCH_HAS_SCHED_WAKE_IDLE*/
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 13:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] load-balancing and cpu_power -v3 Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] sched: add smt_gain Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] sched: dynamic cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] sched: try to deal with low capacity Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] x86: generic aperf/mperf code Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:19 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 9:34 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-09-04 14:22 ` Dave Jones
2009-09-04 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-04 17:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] sched: provide arch_scale_freq_power Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-03 13:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903132213.413056069@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox