From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 01:23:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903232317.GA6760@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4e36d110909031529q77b53122kdb85785ba293c478@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Ok - another bisect game played - and unexpected winner is:
>
> (fat: add ->sync_fs)
>
> f83d6d46e7adf241a064a4a425e5cd8a8fd8925f
>
> Reverting this commit with current -rc8 kernel makes the system happy
> during the suspend/resume cycle. Obviously it has it price :) so just
> plain revert is probably not a good solution so the problem looks
> 'more serious' (fat is not the only fs with this patch) thus adding
> original author to this thread.
Note that when you rever this patch on a current kernel you do actually
get different behvaviour than when going back to before this commit.
In 2.6.30 we called ->write_super in the various sync functions and
then ->sync_fs, in 2.6.31-rc8 you would not call any syncing at all
anymore. I think this patch might just be a symptom for a situation
where the suspend code causes a sync and the mmc driver can't handle
it anymore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-03 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-31 11:51 Regression in suspend to ram in 2.6.31-rc kernels Zdenek Kabelac
2009-08-31 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-01 9:34 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 22:29 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-03 23:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-09-04 0:47 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-04 9:13 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 17:22 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-05 19:53 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-05 22:42 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-08 8:10 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-09 13:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-07 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-09 13:21 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-10 19:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 6:39 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-11 20:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:14 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:32 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 21:45 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-11 21:51 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:05 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-09-14 20:25 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:29 ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 8:39 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2009-09-14 19:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-14 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-18 11:15 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-09-18 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:22 ` Chris Ball
2009-09-11 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-11 22:21 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-11 22:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-08 19:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-08 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-09 13:52 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090903232317.GA6760@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox