From: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:43:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904104324.GA10807@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090825094950.GS3663@in.ibm.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 03:19:50PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> +config CFS_HARD_LIMITS
> + bool "Hard Limits for CFS Group Scheduler"
> + depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
Shouldn't depend also on CGROUPS and CGROUP_SCHED? without them hard
limits can't be defined, right?
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
---
init/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 71868a0..19c0290 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ config FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
config CFS_HARD_LIMITS
bool "Hard Limits for CFS Group Scheduler"
depends on EXPERIMENTAL
- depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
+ depends on FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && CGROUPS && CGROUP_SCHED
default n
help
This option enables hard limiting of CPU time obtained by
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-25 9:47 [RFC v1 PATCH 0/7] CFS Hard limits - v1 Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:48 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 1/7] 1/7 sched: Rename sched_rt_period_mask() and use it in CFS also Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:49 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 2/7] sched: Maintain aggregated tasks count in cfs_rq at each hierarchy level Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:49 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 3/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups Bharata B Rao
2009-09-04 10:43 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2009-09-04 12:32 ` Bharata B Rao
2009-09-04 12:36 ` Andrea Righi
2009-08-25 9:50 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 4/7] sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:51 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 5/7] sched: Unthrottle the throttled tasks Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:51 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 6/7] sched: Add throttle time statistics to /proc/sched_debug Bharata B Rao
2009-08-25 9:53 ` [RFC v1 PATCH 7/7] sched: Hard limits documentation Bharata B Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090904104324.GA10807@linux \
--to=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox