From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: asm-generic update candidates?
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:32:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909041532.50456.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909031729.52538.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
On Thursday 03 September 2009, Robin Getz wrote:
> Arnd:
>
> I was reviewing some files in ./arch/blackfin/include for missing copyrights,
> and while tracking things down I noticed there were still some likely
> candidates for inclusion in asm-generic...
Ah, thanks. I basically started out with the list of files that exist in
almost all architectures. I never looked at files that are identical in
some architectures but nonexistent in more than a few others.
Also, my plan is to do one architecture at a time, not one file at a time
across all architectures, because that will reduce the need for coordination
between multiple maintainers.
> All seem to be the same file:
>
> md5sum:
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f blackfin/include/asm/fb.h
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f cris/include/asm/fb.h
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f frv/include/asm/fb.h
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f h8300/include/asm/fb.h
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f s390/include/asm/fb.h
> 5b6b31d728ed2ed0df73c56676fdc68f xtensa/include/asm/fb.h
Look at the latest version. Some architectures have already started
using the generic version, e.g. blackfin.
> e31d052cbba4f417ba2158a41b0d8709 arm/include/asm/fb.h
> e31d052cbba4f417ba2158a41b0d8709 m32r/include/asm/fb.h
> e31d052cbba4f417ba2158a41b0d8709 sh/include/asm/fb.h
Interesting one. The only difference between these and the
above is the use of pgprot_writecombine, which is defined as
pgprot_noncached on the other architectures.
> Mostly the same:
> mn10300/include/asm/shmparam.h
> frv/include/asm/shmparam.h
> m68k/include/asm/shmparam.h
> h8300/include/asm/shmparam.h
> alpha/include/asm/shmparam.h
> x86/include/asm/shmparam.h
> m32r/include/asm/shmparam.h
> avr32/include/asm/shmparam.h
> powerpc/include/asm/shmparam.h
> blackfin/include/asm/shmparam.h
>
> All the same:
> frv/include/asm/ucontext.h
> h8300/include/asm/ucontext.h
> avr32/include/asm/ucontext.h
> m32r/include/asm/ucontext.h
> cris/include/asm/ucontext.h
> alpha/include/asm/ucontext.h
> mips/include/asm/ucontext.h
> microblaze/include/asm/ucontext.h
> mn10300/include/asm/ucontext.h
> blackfin/include/asm/ucontext.h
Yes, these should come naturally when the architectures
get changed to use the generic headers.
> There seems to be lots of similarities in
> */include/asm/types.h
> */include/asm/kmap_types.h
> */include/asm/termios.h
> */include/asm/socket.h
> */include/asm/param.h
> */include/asm/signal.h (but not all)
> */include/asm/posix_types.h
> */include/asm/termbits.h
> */include/asm/segment.h
> */include/asm/auxvec.h
> */include/asm/shmbuf.h
> */include/asm/spinlock_types.h
>
> Do you keep a list somewhere?
Well, this is how I started out writing doing the common files
in the first place. I looked at the most similar files, and then
used vimdiff on up to four files at a time, changing them to
be exactly identical by editing out all the bitrot.
In general, if a file exists in asm-generic, it should be usable
by some of the architectures, if it does not exist then either it
is too hard to make a generic version or I have not looked at it
yet.
If you want to help convert an architecture, try doing
for i in include/asm-generic/*.h ; do
vimdiff ${i} arch/${ARCH}/include/asm/${i##*/}
done
If the files are identical, replace the contents of the arch
specific one with a simple #include <asm-generic/${i}>. If they
are almost identical, add overrides like in
arch/microblaze/include/asm/posix_types.h, possibly adding the
option for overriding to the generic file. For files that
are rather different, just leave them alone.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-03 21:29 asm-generic update candidates? Robin Getz
2009-09-04 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-09-04 19:39 ` Robin Getz
2009-09-08 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-09-08 16:58 ` Robin Getz
2009-09-09 9:13 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909041532.50456.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox