Re: asm-generic update candidates?

Robin Getz
2009-09-08T16:54:40Z

On Tue 8 Sep 2009 08:55, Arnd Bergmann pondered:
> On Friday 04 September 2009, Robin Getz wrote:
> > I also noticed in Linus's latest (last commit
> > 37d0892c5a94e208cf863e3b7bac014edee4346d):
> >
> > cat arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipc.h
> > #include <asm-generic/ipc.h>
> >
> > but: ls include/asm-generic/ipc.h
> > ls: cannot access include/asm-generic/ipc.h: No such file or directory
>
> Adrian Bunk killed that file in asm/ back in 2007, he probably crossed
> patches with the microblaze architecture.

Ok - that got me doing a quick look:

asm-generic/compat_signal.h doesn't exist?
arch/parisc/include/asm/compat_signal.h:#include <asm-generic/compat_signal.h>

asm-generic/cpumask.h doesn't exist?
arch/frv/include/asm/cpumask.h:#include <asm-generic/cpumask.h>
arch/xtensa/include/asm/cpumask.h:#include <asm-generic/cpumask.h>

asm-generic/ipc.h doesn't exist?
arch/microblaze/include/asm/ipc.h:#include <asm-generic/ipc.h>
arch/mn10300/include/asm/ipc.h:#include <asm-generic/ipc.h>

asm-generic/rmap.h doesn't exist?
arch/xtensa/include/asm/rmap.h:#include <asm-generic/rmap.h>

Maybe checkpatch (or something else?) needs something to make sure all
referenced files are actually in the tree or in the patch?