From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Makefile: Never use -fno-omit-frame-pointer
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:53:48 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904165348.GA1287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090718120145.GB31007@elte.hu>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 02:01:45PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:16:30AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > According to Segher Boessenkool and GCC manual, -fomit-frame-pointer
> > > is only the default when optimising on archs/ABIs where it doesn't
> > > hinder debugging and -pg. So, we do not get it by default on x86,
> > > not at any optimisation level.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, *using* -fno-omit-frame-pointer causes gcc to
> > > produce buggy code on PowerPC targets.
> > >
> > > If Segher and GCC manual are right, this patch should be a no-op
> > > for all arches except PowerPC, where the patch fixes gcc issues.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > See this thread for more discussion:
> > > http://osdir.com/ml/linux-kernel/2009-05/msg01754.html
> > >
> > > p.s.
> > > Obviously, I didn't test this patch on anything else but PPC32. ;-)
> > >
> > > Segher, do you know if all GCC versions that we support for
> > > building Linux are behaving the way that GCC manual describe?
> >
> > No news is good news... Ingo, can we merge this into -tip for
> > testing?
>
> Changes to the top level Makefile should really go via Sam's kbuild
> tree.
Sam, any thoughts about these patches?
Thanks!
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-16 20:16 [PATCH RFC 1/2] Makefile: Never use -fno-omit-frame-pointer Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-14 13:37 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-14 13:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2009-07-18 12:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 16:53 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090904165348.GA1287@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox