From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, David.Woodhouse@intel.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/kbuild] x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig'
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:31:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904183103.GA1873@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA13FE6.20807@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig'
> >>
> >> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build:
> >>
> >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52:
> >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory
> >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> >> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop.
> >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >
> > Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86?
>
> Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used.
Note, i used 'make ARCH=um' so this commit cannot be pushed upwards
until this problem is fixed. It could very well be some missing
changes on the UML side.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tip-5a8a2d13b1526e306ff2a9fe12dc9d5878d355f9@git.kernel.org>
2009-09-04 14:48 ` [tip:x86/kbuild] x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' Ingo Molnar
2009-09-04 15:33 ` David Woodhouse
2009-09-04 16:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 16:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-04 16:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 21:40 ` David Woodhouse
2009-09-04 22:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-09-04 18:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-04 19:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-11 21:16 ` Jeff Dike
2009-09-14 23:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-15 3:33 ` Jeff Dike
2009-09-25 9:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-28 4:31 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090904183103.GA1873@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox