From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933790AbZIDSbW (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:31:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757170AbZIDSbV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:31:21 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:54209 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753422AbZIDSbU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 14:31:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:31:03 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, sam@ravnborg.org, tglx@linutronix.de, David.Woodhouse@intel.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/kbuild] x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' Message-ID: <20090904183103.GA1873@elte.hu> References: <20090904144857.GA12872@elte.hu> <4AA13FE6.20807@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AA13FE6.20807@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 09/04/2009 08:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > >>> x86: Don't silently override CONFIG_64BIT in 'make oldconfig' > >> > >> -tip testing found that this commit broke the UML build: > >> > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile:52: > >> /home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86: No such file or directory > >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target > >> `/home/mingo/tip/arch/um/Makefile-x86'. Stop. > >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > > > Hm, doesn't that mean that UML has always been broken for ARCH=x86? > > Quite possible. ARCH=x86 hasn't exactly been widely used. Note, i used 'make ARCH=um' so this commit cannot be pushed upwards until this problem is fixed. It could very well be some missing changes on the UML side. Ingo