From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Threaded interrupt handlers broken?
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:35:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909042135.38874.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909042105.53944.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Friday 04 September 2009 21:05:51 Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 04 September 2009 20:55:52 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Monday 17 August 2009 14:30:31 Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > Also works. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> >
> > Hm, I've got a strange problem here related to threaded IRQs and rmmod.
> >
> > If I do this sequence, it crashes the machine:
> > request_threaded_irq();
> > free_irq();
> > rmmod module
> > modprobe module
> > request_threaded_irq();
> > *boom*
> >
> > Here are some oops messages. These are almost always different, so I
> > guess it crashes in IRQ context at random places when the IRQ triggers.
> > http://bu3sch.de/misc/irq_crash1.JPG
> > http://bu3sch.de/misc/irq_crash2.JPG
> >
> > It seems to be a NULL pointer dereference somewhere, but I can't locate it.
> > Note that it does not happen, if I omit the rmmod.
> >
>
> Ok, what I see now is that the IRQ thread that belongs to the driver is not
> destroyed on free_irq(). So it is dangling and after rmmod/modprobe it will crash
> on interrupt, because the module is relocated.
> Bringing the device up and down several times (without reloading the module), which
> does several request_threaded_irq(); free_irq() sequences in a row, creates a new
> IRQ thread each time but does not destroy the old one.
Whoopsy, I think I messed up my driver and did not call free_irq(). Sorry for the noise. :(
--
Greetings, Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-16 9:53 Threaded interrupt handlers broken? Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 10:14 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 12:45 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 13:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-16 13:46 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 14:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-16 17:51 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 20:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-16 21:01 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-16 21:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-17 10:23 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-17 10:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-17 11:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-17 11:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-17 11:37 ` Michael Buesch
2009-08-17 12:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-17 12:30 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-04 18:55 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-04 19:05 ` Michael Buesch
2009-09-04 19:35 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-09-04 19:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2009-08-16 13:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909042135.38874.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox