From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tracing/profile: Add filter support
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:01:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090908020117.GC6312@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA4C085.5050006@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 04:12:53PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> - add ftrace_profile_set_filter(), to set filter for a profile event
>
> - filter is enabled when profile probe is registered
>
> - filter is disabled when profile probe is unregistered
>
> - in ftrace_profile_##call(), record events only when
> filter_match_preds() returns 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Well, I feel a bit uncomfortable with this approach.
The events approach taken by perf is different from ftrace.
ftrace events activation/deactivation, ring buffer captures,
filters are all globals. And this is nice to perform kernel
tracing from debugfs files.
But perf has a per counter instance approach. This means
that when a tracepoint counter registers a filter, this should
be private to this tracepoint counter and not propagated to the
others.
So this should rely on a kind of per tracepoint counter
attribute, something that we should probably be stored in
the struct hw_perf_counter like:
--- a/include/linux/perf_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_counter.h
@@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ struct hw_perf_counter {
union { /* software */
atomic64_t count;
struct hrtimer hrtimer;
+ struct event_filter filter;
};
};
atomic64_t prev_count;
You may need to get the current perf context that can
be found in current->perf_counter_ctxp and then iterate
through the counter_list of this ctx to find the current counter
attached to this tracepoint (using the event id).
What is not nice is that we need to iterate in O(n), n beeing the
number of tracepoint counters attached to the current counter
context.
So to avoid the following costly sequence in the tracing fastpath:
- deref ctx->current->perf_counter_ctxp
- list every ctx->counter_list
- find the counter that matches
- deref counter->filter and test...
You could keep the profile_filter field (and profile_filter_active)
in struct ftrace_event_call but allocate them per cpu and
write these fields for a given event each time we enter/exit a
counter context that has a counter that uses this given event.
That's something we could do by using a struct pmu specific for
tracepoints. More precisely with enable/disable callbacks that would do
specific things and then relay on the perf_ops_generic pmu
callbacks.
the struct pmu::enable()/disable() callbacks are functions that are called
each time we schedule in/out a task group that has a counter that
uses the given pmu.
Ie: they are called each time we schedule in/out a counter.
So you have a struct ftrace_event_call. This event can be used in
several different counters instance at the same time. But in a given cpu,
only one of these counters can be currently in use.
Now if we build a simple struct pmu tp_pmu that mostly relays
on the perf_ops_generic pmu but also have a specific enable/disable
pair that calls perf_swcounter_enable/disable and also does:
/*
* We are scheduling this counter on the smp_processor_id() cpu
* (we are in atomic context, ctx->lock acquired) then we
* can safely write a local (per cpu) shortcut from the filter_profile
* field in the event to the counter filter.
*/
static int perf_tpcounter_enable(struct perf_counter *counter)
{
struct event_filter *filter, **shortcut;
int *enable;
struct ftrace_event_call *call;
int cpu = smp_processor_if();
call = find_event_by_id(counter->attr.config);
filter = &counter->hw.filter;
shortcut = &per_cpu_ptr(call->filter_profile, cpu)
enable = &per_cpu_var(call->filter_profile_enabled, cpu)
if (filter is present) {
*enable = 1;
*shortcut = filter;
}
return perf_swcounter_enable(counter);
}
/* We schedule out this counter from this cpu, erase the shortcut */
static void perf_tpcounter_disable(struct perf_counter *counter)
{
/* ... */
enable = 0;
shortcut = NULL;
perf_swcounter_disable(counter);
}
static const struct pmu perf_ops_tracepoint = {
.enable = perf_tpcounter_enable,
.disable = perf_tpcounter_disable,
.read = perf_swcounter_read,
.unthrottle = perf_swcounter_unthrottle,
};
See? Then you can have a O(1) retrieval of the current per
counter filter to apply from ftrace_profile_##call()
I hope I haven't been too much confusing...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-07 8:11 [PATCH 0/6] perf trace: Add filter support Li Zefan
2009-09-07 8:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] tracing/filters: refactor subsystem filter code Li Zefan
2009-09-07 8:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] tracing/profile: Add filter support Li Zefan
2009-09-08 2:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-09-08 2:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-08 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 12:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] tracing/syscalls: Add profile " Li Zefan
2009-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf_counter: Add PERF_COUNTER_IOC_SET_FILTER ioctl Li Zefan
2009-09-07 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 16:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-07 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 0:49 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-08 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-08 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 7:01 ` Tom Zanussi
2009-09-09 2:18 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-10 4:45 ` Tom Zanussi
2009-09-10 23:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-11 4:08 ` Tom Zanussi
2009-09-07 8:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf trace: increase MAX_EVENT_LENGTH Li Zefan
2009-09-07 8:14 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf trace: Add filter support Li Zefan
2009-09-08 0:02 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-08 1:06 ` Li Zefan
2009-09-08 2:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-09-08 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090908020117.GC6312@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox