Re: [RFC][v5][PATCH 8/8]: Define clone_with_pids() syscall

H. Peter Anvin
2009-09-09T18:03:14Z

On 09/09/2009 11:03 AM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> C90 or C99 below should work. Is it ok to use a data structure that is
> not in C89 ?
>

C89 is the same as C90 (C89 refers to the ANSI standard, C90 to the ISO
standard, but they're functionally identical.)

> BTW, would it work if we defined
>
> struct pid_set {
> u64 pids;
> int num_pids;
> }
>
> where ->pids can be still be a pointer ? The data structure would
> have the same size on all architectures.
>

It would rather suck in terms of usability, though.

-hpa