From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: mel@csn.ul.ie, greg@kroah.com, eric.whitney@hp.com,
agl@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
andi@firstfloor.org, rientjes@google.com, apw@canonical.com,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] hugetlb: restore interleaving of bootmem huge pages
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:56:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909145628.66829d5f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252419215.5214.19.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:13:35 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:32 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:33:39PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 03:49:14PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > > > PATCH fix distribution of bootmem huge pages
> > > >
> > > > Against: 2.6.31-rc3
> > > >
> > > > For stable, applicable back through 2.6.27
> > > >
> > > > [A version of this patch has been added to the -mm tree. That patch
> > > > won't apply cleanly to mainline nor stable trees because of function
> > > > renaming. This one should.]
> > >
> > > What is the git commit id of this patch that is in Linus's tree?
> > >
> >
> > I can only find it in mmotm. It doesn't appear to have been merged to
> > mainline at all. Lee, what happened with this? Did it get held off until
> > post-2.6.31 for merging to mainline?
>
> Mel:
>
> This patch, along with the interleaving of freeing persistent huge pages
> are still in mmotm, awaiting the merge window. I had sent out another
> version suitable for mainline and stable--same patch with conflicts
> resolved--but, apparently it didn't make mainline yet.
>
I queued the original patch for 2.6.31 and -stable.
For 2.6.32 I queued a patch which reverts this same patch to make way
for all the new stuff.
It would have been better had the 2.6.31 minipatch come out first!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-09 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 19:49 [PATCH] hugetlb: restore interleaving of bootmem huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-17 22:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-09-03 20:33 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-09-08 10:32 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-08 14:13 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 21:56 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090909145628.66829d5f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox