linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: jack@suse.cz
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] writeback: merge for_kupdate and !for_kupdate requeue io logics
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:51:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090909150600.583737346@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090909145141.293229693@intel.com

[-- Attachment #1: writeback-more_io_wait-a.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2511 bytes --]

Unify the logic for kupdate and non-kupdate cases.
There won't be starvation because the inodes requeued into b_more_io or
b_more_io_wait will later be spliced _after_ the remaining inodes in b_io,
hence won't stand in the way of other inodes in the next run.

CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |   39 ++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c	2009-09-09 20:47:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c	2009-09-09 20:48:01.000000000 +0800
@@ -426,45 +426,18 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
 		} else if (mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
 			/*
 			 * We didn't write back all the pages.  nfs_writepages()
-			 * sometimes bales out without doing anything. Redirty
-			 * the inode; Move it from b_io onto b_more_io/b_dirty.
+			 * sometimes bales out without doing anything.
 			 */
-			/*
-			 * akpm: if the caller was the kupdate function we put
-			 * this inode at the head of b_dirty so it gets first
-			 * consideration.  Otherwise, move it to the tail, for
-			 * the reasons described there.  I'm not really sure
-			 * how much sense this makes.  Presumably I had a good
-			 * reasons for doing it this way, and I'd rather not
-			 * muck with it at present.
-			 */
-			if (wbc->for_kupdate) {
+			inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
+			if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
 				/*
-				 * For the kupdate function we move the inode
-				 * to b_more_io so it will get more writeout as
-				 * soon as the queue becomes uncongested.
+				 * slice used up: queue for next turn
 				 */
-				inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
-				if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) {
-					/*
-					 * slice used up: queue for next turn
-					 */
-					requeue_io(inode);
-				} else {
-					/*
-					 * somehow blocked: retry later
-					 */
-					redirty_tail(inode);
-				}
+				requeue_io(inode);
 			} else {
 				/*
-				 * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that
-				 * other inodes on this superblock will get some
-				 * writeout.  Otherwise heavy writing to one
-				 * file would indefinitely suspend writeout of
-				 * all the other files.
+				 * somehow blocked: retry later
 				 */
-				inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES;
 				redirty_tail(inode);
 			}
 		} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-09 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-09 14:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] some random writeback fixes Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] writeback: cleanup writeback_single_inode() Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:45   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:53   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10  1:26     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:14       ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10 14:17         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] writeback: ensure large files are written in MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES chunks Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] writeback: use 64MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 23:29   ` Theodore Tso
2009-09-10  0:13     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10  4:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10  7:35       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] writeback: dont abort inode on congestion Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2009-09-09 15:44   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10  1:42     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 12:57       ` Chris Mason
2009-09-10 13:21         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:56           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:14             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:31               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:41                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:54                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 16:08                     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090909150600.583737346@intel.com \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).