public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Stable Kernel <stable@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Xen bugfixes
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:16:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910051648.GA1335@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA83F99.5040401@goop.org>


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Here's 3 patches which fix two Xen PV spinlock bugs, and makes 
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR work on both 32- and 64-bit.
> 
> The spinlock bugs are both rare races:
>  - lock can briefly hold the lock while interrupts are enabled, allowing an ISR to deadlock
>  - unlock doesn't enforce CPU memory ordering between the actual unlock write and the check
>    to see if there are any pending waiters, so it can end up deciding there's nobody to
>    kick on unlock, leaving another CPU hanging.  It needs a full mb() to guarantee the correct
>    ordering.
> 
> The stack-protector fix bites the bullet and does a full GDT setup 
> early so that we can load %gs for the stack-protector canary 
> segment on i386.  This also removes the assumption that the 
> initial percpu %fs segment has a zero base.
> 
> x86-64 still just needs the GS_BASE MSR written, but that now 
> happens using the same code as i386 rather than being special 
> cased.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	J
> 
> The following changes since commit e07cccf4046978df10f2e13fe2b99b2f9b3a65db:
>   Linus Torvalds (1):
>         Linux 2.6.31-rc9
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git bugfix
> 
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge (2):
>       xen: make -fstack-protector work under Xen
>       xen: only enable interrupts while actually blocking for spinlock
> 
> Yang Xiaowei (1):
>       xen: use stronger barrier after unlocking lock
> 
>  arch/x86/mm/Makefile     |    4 ++
>  arch/x86/xen/Makefile    |    2 +
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c |  131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/x86/xen/smp.c       |    1 +
>  arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c  |   28 ++++++----
>  drivers/xen/Makefile     |    3 +
>  6 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks a lot Jeremy!

A few comments:

> +# Make sure __phys_addr has no stackprotector
> +nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> +CFLAGS_ioremap.o		:= $(nostackp)
> +

Sure we could move __phys_addr into its own file and thus avoid 
turning off stackprotector for the rest of ioremap.c?

> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Makefile
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ endif
>  # Make sure early boot has no stackprotector
>  nostackp := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
>  CFLAGS_enlighten.o		:= $(nostackp)
> +CFLAGS_mmu.o			:= $(nostackp)

A similar argument could be made here - what proportion of mmu.c is 
affected?

Also, once the commits have hit upstream feel free bounce them to 
stable@kernel.org - they dont have Cc: <stable@kernel.org> tags for 
automatic back-merging requests. The fixes narrowly missed v2.6.31.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-10  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-09 23:51 [GIT PULL] Xen bugfixes Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-10  5:16 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-09-10 17:16   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-10 17:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-10 19:02       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-03 23:46 Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090910051648.GA1335@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox