From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022AbZIJHng (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:43:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753584AbZIJHne (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:43:34 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:33934 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753382AbZIJHnc (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:43:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:43:35 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ed Cashin Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the tree Message-ID: <20090910074334.GQ18599@kernel.dk> References: <20090910144801.2b604ee7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090910072407.GO18599@kernel.dk> <20090910174048.58653ad0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090910174048.58653ad0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 10 2009, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Jens, > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:24:07 +0200 Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > Thanks, I'll update my for-2.6.32 branch today and let that propagate > > into for-next to resolve this. > > Thanks. It is resolved and updated now. -- Jens Axboe