From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753537AbZIJT0j (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753268AbZIJT0i (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:26:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31593 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753256AbZIJT0h (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:26:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:21:53 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrew Morton Cc: Gautham Shenoy , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Slaby , Lai Jiangshan , Li Zefan , Miao Xie , Paul Menage , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] resend, cpuset/hotplug fixes Message-ID: <20090910192153.GA584@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (my apologies to those who see this twice). The 1st patch is preparation. 2-3 fix different problems, the 3rd one depends on 2nd. These patches change the code which I don't really understand, please review. As for the 3rd patch, it replaces cpu_hotplug-dont-affect-current-tasks-affinity.patch in -mm tree. Imho the new patch is more simple and clean, but of course this is subjective and I am biased. Oleg.