From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"avi@qumranet.com" <avi@qumranet.com>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] devmem: introduce size_inside_page()
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:41:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090912144157.GB6511@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911165543.d2485e0e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 07:55:43AM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:23:35 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Introduce size_inside_page() to replace duplicate /dev/mem code.
> >
> > Also apply it to /dev/kmem, whose alignment logic was buggy.
> >
> >
> > CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> > CC: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > CC: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > CC: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/char/mem.c | 60 +++++++++++++------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- linux.orig/drivers/char/mem.c
> > +++ linux/drivers/char/mem.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,19 @@
> > # include <linux/efi.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > +static inline unsigned long size_inside_page(unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned long size)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long sz;
> > +
> > + if (-start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1))
> > + sz = -start & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>
> What on earth is this doing? Negating an unsigned number?
>
> Can we get rid of these party tricks and use something more
> conventional here? In a separate patch I guess.
OK. See the followed patches.
> > + else
> > + sz = PAGE_SIZE;
> > +
> > + return min_t(unsigned long, sz, size);
>
> Can use min() here.
Done.
> > +}
>
> Please have a think about the types. Should we be using unsigned long,
> or size_t? Which makes more sense? Which maps better onto reality?
>
> I suspect that the min_t which you inherited was added somewhere
> because someone didn't get the types right: int-vs-size_t or something.
> If we actually get the types right, this sort of thing goes away.
I tend to just use unsigned long because even though the value itself
is small, it will be elevated to unsigned long in majority use cases.
Does that make sense?
>
> > @@ -462,10 +451,8 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> > if (!kbuf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > while (count > 0) {
> > - int len = count;
> > + int len = size_inside_page(p, count);
>
> int?
Err, changed it to unsigned long sz.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-12 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 2:23 [PATCH 0/3] /dev/mem cleanups and bug fix Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] devmem: remove redundant test on len Wu Fengguang
2009-09-12 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] devmem: introduce size_inside_page() Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:41 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] devmem: cleanup unxlate_dev_mem_ptr() calls Wu Fengguang
2009-09-12 0:05 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-12 14:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-11 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/3] /dev/mem cleanups and bug fix Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090912144157.GB6511@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox