From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
peterz@infradead.org, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor to boost IO performance
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:43:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914004301.105196cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911174019.1ed02737@infradead.org>
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:19 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor
>
> This patch adds a new idle governor which balances power savings,
> energy efficiency and performance impact.
>
> The reason for a reworked governor is that there have been
> serious performance issues reported with the existing code
> on Nehalem server systems.
>
> To show this I'm sure Andrew wants to see benchmark results:
> (benchmark is "fio", "no cstates" is using "idle=poll")
>
> no cstates current linux new algorithm
> 1 disk 107 Mb/s 85 Mb/s 105 Mb/s
> 2 disks 215 Mb/s 123 Mb/s 209 Mb/s
> 12 disks 590 Mb/s 320 Mb/s 585 Mb/s
>
> In various power benchmark measurements, no degredation was found
> by our measurement&diagnostics team. Obviously a bit more power was
> used in the "fio" benchmark, due to the much higher performance.
>
> The integration plan for this is to first add the new governor,
> but for one kernel generation, leave the old menu governor in place
> so that it's possible to separate out behavior from this governor
> versus other things in diagnostics. If no issues are found,
> I'll remove the old governor in the kernel cycle after that.
>
> While it would be a novel idea to describe the new algorithm in this
> commit message, I cheaped out and described it in comments in the
> code instead.
This fails to compile in linux-next:
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu-tng.o:(.discard+0x0): multiple definition of `__pcpu_unique_menu_devices'
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.o:(.discard+0x0): first defined here
because we have
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
in both menu.c and menu-tng.c.
Despite the `static', the percpu changes in
commit 7c756e6e19e71f0327760d8955f7077118ebb2b1
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 24 15:13:50 2009 +0900
Commit: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed Jun 24 15:13:50 2009 +0900
percpu: implement optional weak percpu definitions
are emitting global symbol derived from `menu_devices' and they clash.
I'll rename menu_devices to fix that up, but we have a problem...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 15:40 PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor to boost IO performance Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-11 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-11 19:16 ` John Stoffel
2009-09-11 19:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-14 3:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-09-11 22:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-12 3:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-12 11:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-12 14:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-13 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-14 2:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-14 7:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-14 8:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14 9:09 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 20:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914004301.105196cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox