public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	peterz@infradead.org, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor to boost IO performance
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:43:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914004301.105196cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911174019.1ed02737@infradead.org>

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:40:19 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:

> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor
> 
> This patch adds a new idle governor which balances power savings,
> energy efficiency and performance impact.
> 
> The reason for a reworked governor is that there have been
> serious performance issues reported with the existing code
> on Nehalem server systems.
> 
> To show this I'm sure Andrew wants to see benchmark results:
> (benchmark is "fio", "no cstates" is using "idle=poll")
> 
> 		no cstates	current linux	new algorithm
> 1 disk		107 Mb/s	85 Mb/s		105 Mb/s
> 2 disks		215 Mb/s	123 Mb/s	209 Mb/s
> 12 disks	590 Mb/s	320 Mb/s	585 Mb/s
> 
> In various power benchmark measurements, no degredation was found
> by our measurement&diagnostics team. Obviously a bit more power was
> used in the "fio" benchmark, due to the much higher performance.
> 
> The integration plan for this is to first add the new governor,
> but for one kernel generation, leave the old menu governor in place
> so that it's possible to separate out behavior from this governor
> versus other things in diagnostics. If no issues are found,
> I'll remove the old governor in the kernel cycle after that.
> 
> While it would be a novel idea to describe the new algorithm in this
> commit message, I cheaped out and described it in comments in the
> code instead.

This fails to compile in linux-next:

drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu-tng.o:(.discard+0x0): multiple definition of `__pcpu_unique_menu_devices'
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.o:(.discard+0x0): first defined here

because we have

static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);

in both menu.c and menu-tng.c.

Despite the `static', the percpu changes in

commit 7c756e6e19e71f0327760d8955f7077118ebb2b1
Author:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed Jun 24 15:13:50 2009 +0900
Commit:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed Jun 24 15:13:50 2009 +0900

    percpu: implement optional weak percpu definitions

are emitting global symbol derived from `menu_devices' and they clash.


I'll rename menu_devices to fix that up, but we have a problem...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-11 15:40 PATCH] cpuidle: A new variant of the menu governor to boost IO performance Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-11 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-11 19:16 ` John Stoffel
2009-09-11 19:51   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-14  3:30   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-09-11 22:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-12  3:26   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-12 11:39     ` Matthew Garrett
2009-09-12 14:04       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-13 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-14  2:45   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-14  7:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-14  8:04   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14  8:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-14  9:09       ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-14 20:31   ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090914004301.105196cc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox