From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sedji gaouaou <sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:20:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914082005.GB14204@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090910145944.690c873f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:59:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The next-20090907 and later builds (arm at91cap9adk_defconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: 'struct atmel_ac97_data' declared inside parameter list
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: error: conflicting types for 'at91_add_device_ac97'
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: previous declaration of 'at91_add_device_ac97' was here
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:367: error: variable 'cap9adk_ac97_data' has initializer but incomplete type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c: In function 'cap9adk_board_init':
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:397: warning: passing argument 1 of 'at91_add_device_ac97' from incompatible pointer type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: expected 'struct ac97c_platform_data *' but argument is of type 'struct atmel_ac97_data *'
>
> Caused by commit d656f07a7405e788e1275d0238b67f593615f2bb ("ARM: 5640/1:
> This patch modifies the support of AC97 on the at91sam9263 ek board").
No idea. I guess the Atmel folk have split one logical change up between
two trees, and its only been half merged. I don't see anything in the
patch description which mentions this though.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-10 4:59 linux-next: arm tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 8:20 ` Russell King [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-28 23:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-29 23:45 ` Russell King
2010-01-30 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914082005.GB14204@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sedji.gaouaou@atmel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox