public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
	<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"avi@qumranet.com" <avi@qumranet.com>,
	"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question: how to handle too big f_pos Re: [PATCH] devmem: handle partial kmem write/read
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:11:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090915081107.GA3625@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090915165852.032d164f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

Good catch, Kame!

FYI mmap is OK. I succeeded in reading this address via kmem:

        ffffffff81723880 D modprobe_path

Thanks,
Fengguang

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:58:52PM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> I'm writing a patch against /dev/kmem...I found a problem.
> 
> /dev/kmem (and /proc/<pid>/mem) puts virtual addres to f->f_pos.
> 
> And, f->f_pos is loff_t .... signed value (not unsigned)
> 
> Then, this check
> rw_verify_area(READ, file, pos, count);
> =>
>         pos = *ppos;
>         if (unlikely((pos < 0) || (loff_t) (pos + count) < 0))
>                 return retval;
> 	
> always returns -EINVAL when I read /dev/kmem's valid address.
> 
> Then, how should I do for read /dev/kmem ? Any idea ?
> (Added Al Viro to CC:)
> 
> What I'm really afraid of is /proc/<pid>/mem. IIUC, it's used by gdb to snoop
> memory, (for example, at gcore).
> I think gdb uses ptrace if it fails to read /proc/<pid>/mem but...it's deadly
> slow.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Kame
> 
> p.s. no problems in /proc/kcore..its offset is not bare addresss.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:29:01 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Current vwrite silently ignores vwrite() to vmap holes.
> > Better behavior should be stop the write and return
> > on such holes.
> > 
> > Also return on partial read, which may happen in future
> > (eg. hit hwpoison pages).
> > 
> > CC: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/mem.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- linux-mm.orig/drivers/char/mem.c	2009-09-14 10:59:50.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-mm/drivers/char/mem.c	2009-09-14 11:06:25.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -444,18 +444,22 @@ static ssize_t read_kmem(struct file *fi
> >  		if (!kbuf)
> >  			return -ENOMEM;
> >  		while (count > 0) {
> > +			unsigned long n;
> > +
> >  			sz = size_inside_page(p, count);
> > -			sz = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > -			if (!sz)
> > +			n = vread(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > +			if (!n)
> >  				break;
> > -			if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, sz)) {
> > +			if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, n)) {
> >  				free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> >  				return -EFAULT;
> >  			}
> > -			count -= sz;
> > -			buf += sz;
> > -			read += sz;
> > -			p += sz;
> > +			count -= n;
> > +			buf += n;
> > +			read += n;
> > +			p += n;
> > +			if (n < sz)
> > +				break;
> >  		}
> >  		free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> >  	}
> > @@ -551,11 +555,13 @@ static ssize_t write_kmem(struct file * 
> >  				free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> >  				return -EFAULT;
> >  			}
> > -			sz = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > -			count -= sz;
> > -			buf += sz;
> > -			virtr += sz;
> > -			p += sz;
> > +			n = vwrite(kbuf, (char *)p, sz);
> > +			count -= n;
> > +			buf += n;
> > +			virtr += n;
> > +			p += n;
> > +			if (n < sz)
> > +				break;
> >  		}
> >  		free_page((unsigned long)kbuf);
> >  	}
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-15  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-14  3:29 [PATCH] devmem: handle partial kmem write/read Wu Fengguang
2009-09-14  4:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-15  0:24   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-15  1:52     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-15  2:05       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-15  2:02     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-15  2:31       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-15  2:57         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-15  7:58 ` Question: how to handle too big f_pos " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-15  8:11   ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-15  9:52   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-09-16  5:29   ` [RFC][PATCH][bugfix] more checks for negative f_pos handling (Was Re: Question: how to handle too big f_pos KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-16  8:20     ` Américo Wang
2009-09-16  8:44       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-16  9:13         ` Américo Wang
2009-09-16 12:06           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  3:06             ` Américo Wang
2009-09-17  5:53     ` [RFC][PATCH][bugfix] more checks for negative f_pos handling v2 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  6:07       ` [RFC][PATCH][bugfix] more checks for negative f_pos handling v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  6:21         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-17  6:31           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  6:53             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-17  6:51           ` [RFC][PATCH][bugfix] more checks for negative f_pos handling v4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  7:14             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-17  7:23               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17  7:30                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-17  9:42                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-17 10:54                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17 10:58                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-17 12:40                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-18  0:02                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-18  2:25                         ` Américo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090915081107.GA3625@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox