From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753960AbZIPBnM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:43:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752837AbZIPBnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:43:08 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:43357 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752200AbZIPBnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:43:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:42:37 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Menage Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans (cgroups) Message-Id: <20090915184237.13160e2a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <6599ad830909151740n2affe0daw27618ccae9c737d6@mail.gmail.com> References: <6599ad830909151740n2affe0daw27618ccae9c737d6@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:40:15 -0700 Paul Menage wrote: > How much longer is the merge window open for? A week. > It's probably safest to > hold these in -mm for now since we've not resolved the potential races > in the signal handler accesses; I'll try to find some time to work on > them this week or next. It's not a great time to be fixing these things up. What would happen if we merged it as-is? Can we be confident that the resulting bugs won't impact others and that we can get them all fixed up reasonably promptly?