From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754391AbZIQN3T (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:29:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753763AbZIQN3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:29:18 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46729 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751941AbZIQN3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:29:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:26:09 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes , stable@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [patch 44/45] PCI: Unhide the SMBus on the Compaq Evo D510 USDT Message-ID: <20090917132609.GA4779@kroah.com> References: <20090916223613.597295240@mini.kroah.org> <20090916223719.861500408@mini.kroah.org> <20090917095823.12682531@hyperion.delvare> <20090917113853.GA3061@kroah.com> <20090917150917.3d7d28b8@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090917150917.3d7d28b8@hyperion.delvare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:09:17PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:38:53 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:58:23AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > 2.6.31-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Jean Delvare > > > > > > > > commit 6b5096e4d4496e185cd1ada5d1b8e1d941c805ed upstream. > > > > > > > > One more form factor for Compaq Evo D510, which needs the same quirk > > > > as the other form factors. Apparently there's no hardware monitoring > > > > chip on that one, but SPD EEPROMs, so it's still worth unhiding the > > > > SMBus. > > > > > > FWIW, this one doesn't strike me as being needed in -stable. While it > > > should be safe (otherwise it wouldn't have gone upstream in the first > > > place), it hardly fulfills -stable's requirement that "it must fix a > > > real bug that bothers people". There's no hardware monitoring chip on > > > the SMBus on this machine, and people can easily live without detailed > > > memory module information. > > > > > > So it's up to you, but I won't cry if you drop this patch from -stable. > > > > Heh, you were the one that originally cc:ed the patch to > > stable@kernel.org, so I figured you wanted it in. > > That would be the other me then. Because the first me just double > checked that he hadn't Cc'd stable@kernel.org on this one patch ;) My appologies, you are correct, I had gotten this off of the linux-pci list and copied it to my stable queue as a potential patch for it. Anyway, it's easier for me if it stays :) thanks, greg k-h