* Re: [patch 1/2] spinlocks: check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds
[not found] <200909181957.n8IJv94X001996@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
@ 2009-09-21 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-09-21 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: kilroyd, a.p.zijlstra, linux-kernel
* akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> From: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
>
> When writing code for UP without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK it's easy to get
> the first argument to the spinlock/rwlock functions wrong. This is
> because the parameter is not actually used in this configuration.
>
> Typically you will only find out it's wrong
> * by rebuilding with CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> * after you've submitted your beautiful patch series.
>
> The first means a long wait, and the latter is a bit late.
>
> Change the intermediate macros into inline functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 -
> include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds include/linux/spinlock.h
> --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds
> +++ a/include/linux/spinlock.h
> @@ -240,17 +240,17 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_lock(vo
> #define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> do { \
> typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> - _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
> + _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
> } while (0)
> #define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> do { \
> typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> - _read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
> + _read_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
> } while (0)
these bits broke the Alpha build:
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readb':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:451: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readb' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:456: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_readb' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readw':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:465: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readw' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:470: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_readw' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readl':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:483: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readl' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:488: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_readl' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readq':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:497: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readq' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:504: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_readq' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_writeb':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:513: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_writeb' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:519: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_writeb' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_writew':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:527: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_writew' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:533: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_writew' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_writel':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:545: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_writel' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:550: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_writel' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_writeq':
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:558: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_writeq' which is not static
/home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:565: error: '_spin_unlock_irqrestore' is static but used in inline function 't2_writeq' which is not static
make[2]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel/sys_sable.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [arch/alpha/kernel] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
so i've dropped them for now.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/2] spinlocks: check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds
2009-09-21 7:43 ` [patch 1/2] spinlocks: check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-09-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-21 20:30 ` Dave
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2009-09-21 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: kilroyd, a.p.zijlstra, linux-kernel
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:43:52 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > From: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
> >
> > When writing code for UP without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK it's easy to get
> > the first argument to the spinlock/rwlock functions wrong. This is
> > because the parameter is not actually used in this configuration.
> >
> > Typically you will only find out it's wrong
> > * by rebuilding with CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> > * after you've submitted your beautiful patch series.
> >
> > The first means a long wait, and the latter is a bit late.
> >
> > Change the intermediate macros into inline functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > ---
> >
> > include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 -
> > include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff -puN include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds include/linux/spinlock.h
> > --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds
> > +++ a/include/linux/spinlock.h
> > @@ -240,17 +240,17 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_lock(vo
> > #define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> > do { \
> > typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> > - _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
> > + _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
> > } while (0)
> > #define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
> > do { \
> > typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
> > - _read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
> > + _read_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
> > } while (0)
>
> these bits broke the Alpha build:
>
> /home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readb':
> /home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:451: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readb' which is not static
hm. What the heck does that mean?
__EXTERN_INLINE u8 t2_readb(const volatile void __iomem *xaddr)
Something to do with the extern-inline?
Do you have the .config? My alpha builds went OK.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 1/2] spinlocks: check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds
2009-09-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2009-09-21 20:30 ` Dave
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave @ 2009-09-21 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, a.p.zijlstra, linux-kernel
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:43:52 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>> * akpm@linux-foundation.org <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> When writing code for UP without CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK it's easy to get
>>> the first argument to the spinlock/rwlock functions wrong. This is
>>> because the parameter is not actually used in this configuration.
>>>
>>> Typically you will only find out it's wrong
>>> * by rebuilding with CONFIG_SMP or CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
>>> * after you've submitted your beautiful patch series.
>>>
>>> The first means a long wait, and the latter is a bit late.
>>>
>>> Change the intermediate macros into inline functions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@googlemail.com>
>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> include/linux/spinlock.h | 6 -
>>> include/linux/spinlock_api_up.h | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff -puN include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds include/linux/spinlock.h
>>> --- a/include/linux/spinlock.h~spinlocks-check-spinlock_t-rwlock_t-argument-type-on-non-smp-builds
>>> +++ a/include/linux/spinlock.h
>>> @@ -240,17 +240,17 @@ static inline void smp_mb__after_lock(vo
>>> #define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
>>> do { \
>>> typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
>>> - _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
>>> + _spin_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
>>> } while (0)
>>> #define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
>>> do { \
>>> typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
>>> - _read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
>>> + _read_lock_irqsave(lock, &flags); \
>>> } while (0)
>> these bits broke the Alpha build:
>>
>> /home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h: In function 't2_readb':
>> /home/mingo/tip/arch/alpha/include/asm/core_t2.h:451: error: '_spin_lock_irqsave' is static but used in inline function 't2_readb' which is not static
>
> hm. What the heck does that mean?
>
> __EXTERN_INLINE u8 t2_readb(const volatile void __iomem *xaddr)
>
> Something to do with the extern-inline?
This came up the last time this went into Ingos tree. And yes, it's the
extern inlines using the spinlock functions that causes the error.
> Do you have the .config? My alpha builds went OK.
Last I checked, you need to have:
CONFIG_SMP=N
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=N
The latter gets auto-selected, so I set:
CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=N
CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=N
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=N
CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=N
Regards,
Dave.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-21 20:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200909181957.n8IJv94X001996@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-21 7:43 ` [patch 1/2] spinlocks: check spinlock_t/rwlock_t argument type on non-SMP builds Ingo Molnar
2009-09-21 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-21 20:30 ` Dave
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox