From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755597AbZIVJDB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:03:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755523AbZIVJDA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:03:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:41991 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754383AbZIVJDA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:03:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:02:48 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Miller Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses Message-ID: <20090922090248.GA7755@elte.hu> References: <20090921140848.444528343@chello.nl> <20090921.101021.193734103.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090921.101021.193734103.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Miller wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200 > > > > > based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets > > x86 stay with regular allocations. > > > > While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around, > > I see no other way to please both sides. > > If you guys want to maintain two implementations of the same thing, > that's fine with me :) I take this as an acked-by :-) I'll reshape these patches on top of the counters -> events rename. Ingo