From: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER.
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:55:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090922112526.GA7788@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
This patchset introduces cpuidle infrastructure to POWER, prototyping
for pSeries, and also does a major refactoring of current x86 idle
power management and a cleanup of cpuidle infrastructure.
My earlier iterations can be found at:
v5 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/26
v4 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/1/133
v3 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/124
v2 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233
v1 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/19/150
Changes in this version:
------------------------------------------
Remove the bug from previous iteration in the routine
cpuidle_remove_from_list(), which was causing the kernel to panic on
platform supporting multiple sleep states.
Add the routine cpuidle_kick_cpus() in POWER, which is needed to kick
the cpus out of their idle when changing the idle routines.
TODO:
-------------------------------------------
Peterz suggested it would be nice to have a sysfs interface through
which an idle routine can be forced at runtime.
Also, current implementation registers every cpu as a cpuidle_device,
but this is an overkill and the registering mechanism should be a
systemwide process and not per-cpu. (probably one of the original
cpuidle authors can reply to this - Venki, Shaohua Li? ).
ppc_md.power_save has been replaced by cpuidle_idle_call only for
pseries. So this needs to be done for all POWER platforms so that
ppc_md.power_save is completely removed.
Any comments on the design is welcome.
--arun
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-22 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 11:25 Arun R Bharadwaj [this message]
2009-09-22 11:27 ` [v6 PATCH 1/7]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:28 ` [v6 PATCH 2/7]: cpuidle: implement a list based approach to register a set of idle routines Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:29 ` [v6 PATCH 3/7]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code and remove all instances of pm_idle Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:30 ` [v6 PATCH 4/7]: POWER: enable cpuidle for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:31 ` [v6 PATCH 5/7]: pSeries/cpuidle: remove dedicate/shared idle loops, which will be moved to arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:32 ` [v6 PATCH 6/7]: POWER: add a default_idle idle loop for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:33 ` [v6 PATCH 7/7]: pSeries: implement pSeries processor idle module Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-24 5:12 ` [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-24 12:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 7:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-25 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25 9:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 7:20 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-25 17:08 ` Arun R Bharadwaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090922112526.GA7788@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox