public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:33:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090923124027.456325340@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090923123337.990689487@intel.com

[-- Attachment #1: writeback-ratelimit.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2371 bytes --]

Some filesystem may choose to write much more than ratelimit_pages
before calling balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(). So it is safer to
determine number to write based on real number of dirtied pages.

The increased write_chunk may make the dirtier more bumpy.  This is
filesystem writers' duty not to dirty too much at a time without
checking the ratelimit.

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2009-09-23 16:31:46.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c	2009-09-23 16:33:19.000000000 +0800
@@ -44,12 +44,12 @@ static long ratelimit_pages = 32;
 /*
  * When balance_dirty_pages decides that the caller needs to perform some
  * non-background writeback, this is how many pages it will attempt to write.
- * It should be somewhat larger than RATELIMIT_PAGES to ensure that reasonably
+ * It should be somewhat larger than dirtied pages to ensure that reasonably
  * large amounts of I/O are submitted.
  */
-static inline long sync_writeback_pages(void)
+static inline long sync_writeback_pages(unsigned long dirtied)
 {
-	return ratelimit_pages + ratelimit_pages / 2;
+	return dirtied + dirtied / 2;
 }
 
 /* The following parameters are exported via /proc/sys/vm */
@@ -476,7 +476,8 @@ get_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackgro
  * If we're over `background_thresh' then pdflush is woken to perform some
  * writeout.
  */
-static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
+static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
+				unsigned long write_chunk)
 {
 	long nr_reclaimable, bdi_nr_reclaimable;
 	long nr_writeback, bdi_nr_writeback;
@@ -484,7 +485,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
 	unsigned long dirty_thresh;
 	unsigned long bdi_thresh;
 	unsigned long pages_written = 0;
-	unsigned long write_chunk = sync_writeback_pages();
 	unsigned long pause = 1;
 
 	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
@@ -640,9 +640,10 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
 	p =  &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
 	*p += nr_pages_dirtied;
 	if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit)) {
+		ratelimit = sync_writeback_pages(*p);
 		*p = 0;
 		preempt_enable();
-		balance_dirty_pages(mapping);
+		balance_dirty_pages(mapping, ratelimit);
 		return;
 	}
 	preempt_enable();



  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-23 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-23 12:33 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] writeback fixes for 2.6.32 Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-09-23 12:45   ` [PATCH 1/6] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-23 12:53     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 13:56   ` [PATCH 1/6 -v2] " Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 13:58     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] writeback: stop background writeback when below background threshold Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 15:05   ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-24  1:24     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] writeback: kupdate writeback shall not stop when more io is possible Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] writeback: cleanup writeback_single_inode() Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] writeback: don't delay inodes redirtied by a fast dirtier Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 13:20   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 13:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-23 13:40       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-26 19:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-27  2:02     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-23 12:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] writeback: redirty a fully scanned inode Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090923124027.456325340@intel.com \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox