From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: clean up orig_ax handling
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:41:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090923154118.GB6105@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090923061834.BE13A22@magilla.sf.frob.com>
* Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
> Here is the aforementioned other tack on this.
>
> I said earlier that getreg() (i.e. 64-bit ptrace/core-dump fetches)
> should sign-extend the low 32 bits of orig_ax up. But I've changed my
> mind. It's true that today you can store 0xffffffff via either 64-bit
> ptrace or 32-bit ptrace and then read back -1 via 64-bit ptrace. (This
> wasn't always so, and so we can hope that no debugger really depends on
> it.) What seems more important is that tracing and core dumps correctly
> show the full orig_ax value incoming in %rax from userland, since
> %rax=__NR_foo|(1UL<<32) behaves differently (i.e. -ENOSYS) than
> %eax=_NR_foo in actual fact when user-mode does "syscall" with those
> values. In a bogon case like that, you would like to have traces/dumps
> tell you why the task is not making a proper syscall rather than lie
> about what register bits it entered the kernel with.
>
> Patches 1-3 change no ptrace-tests outcomes, i.e. don't regress on the
> test cases that went with the original sign-extension changes. They
> reintroduce e.g. the ability to blindly read and write back the whole
> regset when at syscall-entry tracing with %rax=__NR_foo|(1UL<<32) and
> have that fail with -ENOSYS as it would without tracing rather than
> perturb the tracee to call sys_foo instead. (Not that this is useful.)
>
> Patch 4 does Linus's fix for the outstanding bug. I've verified it works.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
> ---
> The following changes since commit 7fa07729e439a6184bd824746d06a49cca553f15:
> Linus Torvalds (1):
> Merge branch 'perf-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../tip/linux-2.6-tip
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frob/linux-2.6-roland.git x86/orig_ax
>
> Roland McGrath (4):
> asm-generic: syscall_get_nr returns int
> x86: syscall_get_nr returns int
> x86: ptrace: do not sign-extend orig_ax on write
> x86: ptrace: set TS_COMPAT when 32-bit ptrace sets orig_eax>=0
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 14 +++++++-------
> arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
> include/asm-generic/syscall.h | 8 ++++++--
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Linus, this series looks good to me. Do you want to pull this directly
or should we test this for a few days in the x86 tree? (either solution
is fine to me)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-23 0:46 [PATCH] x86: ptrace: sign-extend eax with orig_eax>=0 Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 1:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-23 2:40 ` Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 6:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86: clean up orig_ax handling Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] asm-generic: syscall_get_nr returns int Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 6:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: " Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 6:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86: ptrace: do not sign-extend orig_ax on write Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 6:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: ptrace: set TS_COMPAT when 32-bit ptrace sets orig_eax>=0 Roland McGrath
2009-09-23 15:41 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-09-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86: clean up orig_ax handling Linus Torvalds
2009-09-23 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090923154118.GB6105@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox