From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: module: Speed up symbol resolution during module loading
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:53 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909240938.54063.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ABA523F.7000601@tuffmail.co.uk>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:22:15 am Alan Jenkins wrote:
> [CC to lkml fixed :-/]
>
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:58:28 pm Alan Jenkins wrote:
> >
> >> The following series applies against v2.6.31. It sorts the tables of builtin
> >> symbols, so the module loader can resolve them using a binary search.
> >>
> >> The kbuild changes to achieve this are less scary than I expected. I'm
> >> optimistic that they can be accepted without radical alteration :-).
> >>
> >> Quoting from the last patch in this series:
> >>
> >> "On my EeePC 701, coldplug is mainly cpu bound and takes 1.5 seconds
> >> during boot. perf showed this change eliminated 20% of cpu cycles during
> >> coldplug, saving 0.3 seconds of real time.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > This seems useful, but wouldn't it be simpler to just sort at boot time?
> > The same could be done for modules, possibly reducing code.
> >
> > Alternately, there's a standard way of hashing ELF symbols, but I'm not sure
> > we can convince the linker to generate it for vmlinux (I haven't looked
> > though).
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Rusty.
> >
>
> I'm concerned that people would object to the extra overhead at boot
> time. I've hacked up a prototype to sort at boot time and it takes 7ms
> on the same hardware.
OK, that seems a lot to me. Fair enough; if Sam acks the build parts, I'll
put it in my tree. A bit late for this merge window though.
Thanks!
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1253626112-18429-1-git-send-email-alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
[not found] ` <200909231002.16759.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-09-23 16:52 ` module: Speed up symbol resolution during module loading Alan Jenkins
2009-09-24 0:08 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-09-22 13:38 Alan Jenkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909240938.54063.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox