From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Abbott <michael@araneidae.co.uk>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Johan van Baarlen <jf@vanbaarlen.demon.nl>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cputime tree
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:51:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090924095106.62294617.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090924133136.7b7c834e@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:31:36 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> with git commit 79741dd "idle cputime accounting" the semantic
> of the stime field of the idle processes has changed. It used to
> contain the amount of time the idle process has been scheduled.
> Since git commit 79741dd is contains the cpu time spent in the
> system by the idle process.
>
> This change broke the output of second field of /proc/uptime. On
> systems without VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING the field is always zero.
> The legacy output of the field is the amount of time the idle
> process has been scheduled on cpu #0. It is good enough to
> calculate the load on an uni-processor system, it is useless
> on a multi-processor. To restore the legacy behaviour and give
> meaning to the multi-processor case the best we could come up
> with is to add the idle time over all cpus. That fixes uni-
> processors systems and gives a defined semantic on smp.
>
> So please pull from 'cputime' branch of
>
> git://git390.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git cputime
>
> to receive the following updates:
>
> Michael Abbott (1):
> Fix idle time field in /proc/uptime
>
> fs/proc/uptime.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/uptime.c b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> index 0c10a0b..766b1d4 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/uptime.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> @@ -4,13 +4,18 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> #include <asm/cputime.h>
>
> static int uptime_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct timespec uptime;
> struct timespec idle;
> - cputime_t idletime = cputime_add(init_task.utime, init_task.stime);
> + int i;
> + cputime_t idletime = cputime_zero;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + idletime = cputime64_add(idletime, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.idle);
>
> do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
> monotonic_to_bootbased(&uptime);
This is a regression fix, iirc? One which is applicable for several 2.6.x
kernel versions?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-24 11:31 [GIT PULL] cputime tree Martin Schwidefsky
2009-09-24 16:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-24 19:49 ` Michael Abbott
2009-10-01 22:31 ` [stable] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090924095106.62294617.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=jf@vanbaarlen.demon.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@araneidae.co.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox