Re: [patch 02/12] Immediate Values - Architecture Independent Code

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:26:28 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:

> Immediate values are used as read mostly variables that are rarely updated. They
> use code patching to modify the values inscribed in the instruction stream. It
> provides a way to save precious cache lines that would otherwise have to be used
> by these variables.

What a hare-brained concept.

> * Why should this be merged *
> 
> It improves performances on heavy memory I/O workloads.
> 
> An interesting result shows the potential this infrastructure has by
> showing the slowdown a simple system call such as getppid() suffers when it is
> used under heavy user-space cache trashing:
> 
> Random walk L1 and L2 trashing surrounding a getppid() call:
> (note: in this test, do_syscal_trace was taken at each system call, see
> Documentation/immediate.txt in these patches for details)
> - No memory pressure :   getppid() takes  1573 cycles
> - With memory pressure : getppid() takes 15589 cycles

Our ideas of what constitutes an "interesting result" differ.

Do you have any data which indicates that this thing is of any real
benefit to anyone for anything?