From: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER.
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:38:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090925170851.GA28191@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090922112526.GA7788@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
Hi,
I have done the following experiments and have posted the results
below.
Average of 5 iterations:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernbench make -j16 results on a
16 core x86 machine _with_deep_sleep_ support (C1,C2,C3)
Without the patches applied With the patches applied
31.8s 30.4s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernbench make -j8 results on a
8 core x86 machine _without_deep_sleep_ support (only mwait)
Without the patches applied With the patches applied
20.2s 20.4s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernbench make -j8 results on a 8 core _dedicated_lpar_pSeries_ machine
Without the patches applied With the patches applied
4m, 37s 4m, 36s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please let me know if any other kind of testing is necessary.
Based on the feedback, I will post out the next iteration with a few
minor bug fixes.
thanks,
arun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-25 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 11:25 [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:27 ` [v6 PATCH 1/7]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:28 ` [v6 PATCH 2/7]: cpuidle: implement a list based approach to register a set of idle routines Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:29 ` [v6 PATCH 3/7]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code and remove all instances of pm_idle Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:30 ` [v6 PATCH 4/7]: POWER: enable cpuidle for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:31 ` [v6 PATCH 5/7]: pSeries/cpuidle: remove dedicate/shared idle loops, which will be moved to arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:32 ` [v6 PATCH 6/7]: POWER: add a default_idle idle loop for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-22 11:33 ` [v6 PATCH 7/7]: pSeries: implement pSeries processor idle module Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-24 5:12 ` [v6 PATCH 0/7]: cpuidle/x86/POWER: Cleanup idle power management code in x86, cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c and introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-09-24 12:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 7:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-25 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25 9:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-25 7:20 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-25 17:08 ` Arun R Bharadwaj [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090925170851.GA28191@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox