From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752551AbZIZSUl (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:20:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751890AbZIZSUk (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:20:40 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:48169 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750897AbZIZSUk (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:20:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:20:43 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [origin tree build failure] Re: [PULL] Please pull hwpoison code for 2.6.32 Message-ID: <20090926182043.GU30185@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20090926172802.GS30185@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090926172802.GS30185@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:15:23AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We're definitely going to continue to have this problem until we decide we have hit the pain threshold either support external *zone* numbers or permit a 64-bit pageflags. Yes I agree. I implemented a perfect hash scheme for the NUMA pfn->node mapping a long time ago which is still there, that code could be probably extended to support zones too. It would just make the hash slightly larger. -Andi