* Re: [tip:tracing/core] tracing/bkl: Add bkl ftrace events [not found] <tip-96a2c464de07d7c72988db851c029b204fc59108@git.kernel.org> @ 2009-09-26 10:05 ` Steven Rostedt 2009-09-28 8:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Steven Rostedt @ 2009-09-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, mingo, hpa, fweisbec, lizf, tglx; +Cc: linux-tip-commits On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 06:19 +0000, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Commit-ID: 96a2c464de07d7c72988db851c029b204fc59108 > +#if !defined(_TRACE_BKL_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) > +#define _TRACE_BKL_H > + > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h> > + > +TRACE_EVENT(lock_kernel, > + > + TP_PROTO(const char *func, const char *file, int line), > + > + TP_ARGS(func, file, line), > + > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > + __field( int, lock_depth ) FYI, By your request I added this as a common field ;-) With commit: 637e7e864103a7a68c1ce43ada27dfc25c0d113f But since other utilities outside of ftrace may use this trace point, it may be OK to keep the duplicate information in the kernel lock API trace points. -- Steve > + __field_ext( const char *, func, FILTER_PTR_STRING ) > + __field_ext( const char *, file, FILTER_PTR_STRING ) > + __field( int, line ) > + ), > + > + TP_fast_assign( > + /* We want to record the lock_depth after lock is acquired */ > + __entry->lock_depth = current->lock_depth + 1; > + __entry->func = func; > + __entry->file = file; > + __entry->line = line; > + ), > + > + TP_printk("depth: %d, %s:%d %s()", __entry->lock_depth, > + __entry->file, __entry->line, __entry->func) > +); > + ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [tip:tracing/core] tracing/bkl: Add bkl ftrace events 2009-09-26 10:05 ` [tip:tracing/core] tracing/bkl: Add bkl ftrace events Steven Rostedt @ 2009-09-28 8:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2009-09-28 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, hpa, lizf, tglx, linux-tip-commits On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 06:05:54AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 06:19 +0000, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker > wrote: > > Commit-ID: 96a2c464de07d7c72988db851c029b204fc59108 > > > +#if !defined(_TRACE_BKL_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ) > > +#define _TRACE_BKL_H > > + > > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h> > > + > > +TRACE_EVENT(lock_kernel, > > + > > + TP_PROTO(const char *func, const char *file, int line), > > + > > + TP_ARGS(func, file, line), > > + > > + TP_STRUCT__entry( > > + __field( int, lock_depth ) > > FYI, > > By your request I added this as a common field ;-) > > With commit: > > 637e7e864103a7a68c1ce43ada27dfc25c0d113f > > But since other utilities outside of ftrace may use this trace point, it > may be OK to keep the duplicate information in the kernel lock API trace > points. > > -- Steve Right, or may be we can define this tracepoint as a latency format user by default. It's not possible yet for an event to do that but I guess we can set a flag for this purpose or something... Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-28 8:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <tip-96a2c464de07d7c72988db851c029b204fc59108@git.kernel.org>
2009-09-26 10:05 ` [tip:tracing/core] tracing/bkl: Add bkl ftrace events Steven Rostedt
2009-09-28 8:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox