public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for  copy_from_user
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:24:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090929112410.0adc17f6@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970909282255y6718b11cvadafae0e1648817c@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:55:49 +1000
Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Arjan van de Ven
> <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for
> > copy_from_user CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> >
> > The capabilities syscall has a copy_from_user() call where gcc
> > currently cannot prove to itself that the copy is always within
> > bounds.
> >
> > This patch adds a very explicity bound check to prove to gcc that
> > this copy_from_user cannot overflow its destination buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> > index 4e17041..204f11f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/capability.c
> > +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> > @@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capget, cap_user_header_t,
> > header, cap_user_data_t, dataptr) SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset,
> > cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data) {
> >        struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
> > -       unsigned i, tocopy;
> > +       unsigned i, tocopy, copybytes;
> >        kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
> >        struct cred *new;
> >        int ret;
> > @@ -255,8 +258,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t,
> > header, const cap_user_data_t, data) if (pid != 0 && pid !=
> > task_pid_vnr(current)) return -EPERM;
> >
> > -       if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data,
> > -                          tocopy * sizeof(struct
> > __user_cap_data_struct)))
> > +       copybytes = tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct);
> > +       if (copybytes > _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S)
> > +               return -EFAULT;
> 
> This is broken, it breaks dbus at least for me. you compare bytes
> to u32s wrongly.
> 
> Dave.

good point

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities for copy_from_user
CC: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

The capabilities syscall has a copy_from_user() call where gcc currently
cannot prove to itself that the copy is always within bounds.

This patch adds a very explicity bound check to prove to gcc that 
this copy_from_user cannot overflow its destination buffer.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
index 4e17041..204f11f 100644
--- a/kernel/capability.c
+++ b/kernel/capability.c
@@ -238,7 +241,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capget, cap_user_header_t, header, cap_user_data_t, dataptr)
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data)
 {
 	struct __user_cap_data_struct kdata[_KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S];
-	unsigned i, tocopy;
+	unsigned i, tocopy, copybytes;
 	kernel_cap_t inheritable, permitted, effective;
 	struct cred *new;
 	int ret;
@@ -255,8 +258,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(capset, cap_user_header_t, header, const cap_user_data_t, data)
 	if (pid != 0 && pid != task_pid_vnr(current))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data,
-			   tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct)))
+	copybytes = tocopy * sizeof(struct __user_cap_data_struct);
+	if (copybytes > sizeof(kdata))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (copy_from_user(&kdata, data, copybytes))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tocopy; i++) {



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-29  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-26 18:49 [PATCH 0/9] Series to make copy_from_user to a stack slot provable right Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] Fix bound checks for copy_from_user in the acpi /proc code Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] Simplify bound checks in nvram for copy_from_user Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] Add bound checks in wext " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] Simplify bound checks in the MTRR code Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-02 18:36   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] Add bound checks in acpi/video for copy_from_user Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] Simplify bound checks in cifs " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29  5:55   ` Dave Airlie
2009-09-29  9:24     ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-10-01 22:34       ` James Morris
2009-09-26 18:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] Add explicit bound checks in mm/migrate.c Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 22:20   ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-01  5:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
     [not found]   ` <tip-b925585039cf39275c2e0e57512e5df27fa73aad@git.kernel.org>
2009-12-13 23:38     ` [tip:x86/urgent] mm: Adjust do_pages_stat() so gcc can see copy_from_user() is safe KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-26 18:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] Add explicit bound checks in net/socket.c Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:01   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-26 19:05     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:35       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-28 19:57       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090929112410.0adc17f6@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox