From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com,
don@syst.com.br, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
cascardo@holoscopio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cmpc_acpi: Added support for Classmate PC ACPI devices.
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:05:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090929130522.ecf4d5ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1254188280-29155-1-git-send-email-cascardo@holoscopio.com>
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:38:00 -0300
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com> wrote:
> This add supports for devices like keyboard, backlight, tablet and
> accelerometer.
>
> This work is supported by International Syst S/A.
>
I need to have a big whine about the coding style.
> +static acpi_status cmpc_start_accel(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> + union acpi_object param[2];
> + struct acpi_object_list input;
> + acpi_status status;
> + param[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> + param[0].integer.value = 0x3;
> + param[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> + input.count = 2;
> + input.pointer = param;
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "ACMD", &input, NULL);
> + return status;
> +}
To the jaded kernel developer's eye, this is quite hard to read. Every
function here squishes the declarations of the locals up against the
start of the code. It's a small thing, but this:
static acpi_status cmpc_start_accel(acpi_handle handle)
{
union acpi_object param[2];
struct acpi_object_list input;
acpi_status status;
param[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
param[0].integer.value = 0x3;
param[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
input.count = 2;
input.pointer = param;
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "ACMD", &input, NULL);
return status;
}
puts a smile on our faces.
>
> ...
>
> +static ssize_t cmpc_accel_sense_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *acpi;
> + int sense;
> + acpi = to_acpi_device(dev);
> + if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &sense) <= 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + cmpc_accel_set_sense(acpi->handle, sense);
> + return strnlen(buf, count);
> +}
This will treat input of the form "42foo" as a valid decimal number.
That's a bit sloppy. Can we use strict_strtoul() here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 1:38 [PATCH] cmpc_acpi: Added support for Classmate PC ACPI devices Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-09-29 9:20 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-09-29 14:16 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-09-29 16:41 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-01 16:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-09-29 16:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-29 20:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-29 20:10 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-09-29 20:17 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-30 15:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-30 17:51 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-09-30 18:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-30 18:57 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090929130522.ecf4d5ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cascardo@holoscopio.com \
--cc=don@syst.com.br \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox