From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@tglx.de,
hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use __builtin_memset and __builtin_memcpy for memset/memcpy
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:44:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909291444.06422.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090928113433.5e9b8ea7@infradead.org>
On Monday 28 September 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> GCC provides reasonable memset/memcpy functions itself, with __builtin_memset
> and __builtin_memcpy. For the "unknown" cases, it'll fall back to our
> current existing functions, but for fixed size versions it'll inline
> something smart. Quite often that will be the same as we have now,
> but sometimes it can do something smarter (for example, if the code
> then sets the first member of a struct, it can do a shorter memset).
>
> In addition, and this is more important, gcc knows which registers and
> such are not clobbered (while for our asm version it pretty much
> acts like a compiler barrier), so for various cases it can avoid reloading
> values.
>
> The effect on codesize is shown below on my typical laptop .config:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 5605675 2041100 6525148 14171923 d83f13 vmlinux.before
> 5595849 2041668 6525148 14162665 d81ae9 vmlinux.after
>
The patch looks good, but is there a reason to keep it architecture
specific? I would guess that the same logic applies to all architectures
with gcc-4.x and could be put into include/linux/compiler-gcc4.h.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-29 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-28 9:34 [PATCH] x86: Use __builtin_memset and __builtin_memcpy for memset/memcpy Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-28 12:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-28 23:47 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29 12:44 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-09-29 12:53 ` [PATCH] " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29 15:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-02 19:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-02 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-02 20:12 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909291444.06422.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@tglx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox