public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class)
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:04:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930120406.GD1412@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253667103.25689.35.camel@desktop>

On Tue 2009-09-22 17:51:43, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 21:11 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Now at patch patches/sched_edf-scheduling-class.patch
> > 
> > Daniel is a kind of self-elected joker-bot on lkml, running checkpatch 
> > out of .procmailrc and annoying people with trivial comments, 
> > distracting from the real discussion. Raistlin, feel free to ignore him 
> > in the future.

Good, I was afraid Ingo would actually like that behaviour.

> You want to talk about it constructively or not? I'll stop sending those
> emails if it's actually negative , but I don't think it is..

Getting you 'have misplaced parenthesis' feedback on a bugfix, on a
file thatt has 1001 checkpatch problems, and when the patch does not
actually introduce the problem... certainly is unwelcome.

What about simply avoiding the mails when the file being changed
already has checkpatch problems?
									Pavel 

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-30 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-22 10:30 [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 12:51   ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 18:36     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-23 12:19       ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:25         ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-27  6:55       ` Henrik Austad
2009-09-29 16:10         ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 17:34           ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-30 15:58             ` Raistlin
2009-09-30 17:35               ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-22 11:58 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 12:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 16:08     ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 13:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 14:01   ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 14:02     ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 16:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 19:11       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23  0:51         ` checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class) Daniel Walker
2009-09-23  1:01           ` Joe Perches
2009-09-23  1:11             ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 19:24               ` Andy Isaacson
2009-09-24 14:58                 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:06               ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 12:22             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:43               ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:04           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-09-23  7:03         ` [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-23 21:39     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-24  0:58       ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-22 16:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 23:39   ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-22 23:55     ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23  0:06       ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-23  0:40         ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 11:46           ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 12:25             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:50               ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 14:58                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:08                   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 15:12                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:24                       ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:05                 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-22 20:55 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:00   ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 13:22   ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-23 14:08     ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 14:45       ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 12:50   ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:30   ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 18:15     ` roel kluin
2009-09-30 15:59       ` Raistlin
2009-09-24  0:34 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-24  6:08   ` Raistlin
2009-09-24  9:11   ` Claudio Scordino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090930120406.GD1412@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox