From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Raistlin <raistlin@linux.it>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@evidence.eu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:05:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930120535.GE1412@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253717459.20648.39.camel@desktop>
On Wed 2009-09-23 07:50:59, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 14:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> discouraging contributions is more something that happens when you
> > >> get the responses I got earlier in this thread..
> > >
> > > That's probably intentional. Whitespace fixes have their place but
> > > not at this stage in a patch's lifecycle.
> >
> > Exactly. What might make sense is to scan linux-next for new commits
> > that show serious cleanliness trouble - and send fix patches to the
> > parties involved. That's a real effort and brings the code forward.
>
> Often times when a patch is at youngest that when you want to catch
> these issues .. This EDF patch will likely get submitted more than
> twice. If you catch all the minor problems first you will not be dealing
> with them later when it comes time to include the code.
You want to deal with them later, because many patches end up in
trashcan...
Now, Ingo's idea of scanning -next (and fixing it) sounds sane...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 10:30 [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 12:51 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-23 12:19 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Dhaval Giani
2009-09-27 6:55 ` Henrik Austad
2009-09-29 16:10 ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 17:34 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-30 15:58 ` Raistlin
2009-09-30 17:35 ` Chris Friesen
2009-09-22 11:58 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-24 16:08 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-22 13:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 14:01 ` Raistlin
2009-09-22 14:02 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-22 16:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 0:51 ` checkpatch as a tool (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class) Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 1:01 ` Joe Perches
2009-09-23 1:11 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 19:24 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-09-24 14:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:06 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:04 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-23 7:03 ` [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_EDF scheduling class Raistlin
2009-09-23 21:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-09-24 0:58 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-22 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-22 23:39 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-22 23:55 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 0:06 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-09-23 0:40 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 11:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 12:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-23 14:50 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 14:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:08 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-23 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-23 15:24 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 12:05 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-09-22 20:55 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 13:22 ` Claudio Scordino
2009-09-23 14:08 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 14:45 ` Raistlin
2009-09-23 12:33 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 12:50 ` Linus Walleij
2009-09-23 13:30 ` Raistlin
2009-09-29 18:15 ` roel kluin
2009-09-30 15:59 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 0:34 ` GeunSik Lim
2009-09-24 6:08 ` Raistlin
2009-09-24 9:11 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090930120535.GE1412@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=fabio@gandalf.sssup.it \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox