From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc1
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:00:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930210054.GD24862@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC3C562.6080306@gmail.com>
* Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar a écrit :
> >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> Yes, I provided following version in my first answer but apparently
> >>> it was too complex :)
> >
> > Yeah, i too missed it while reading through the thread.
> >
> > Ingo
>
> Well, I was refering to Arjan answer, not Linus/Ingo ones, and Arjan
> did read my answer and said it was buggy... Its not a problem I dont
> have 486 here anyway :)
I picked up the improvement that is in your version nevertheless. Even
if it doesnt matter in practice we dont drop good code :)
> You are all obviously right, I should more carefuly edit mails before
> hit 'Envoyer' button.
It happens. Since email on lkml is the precursor to real code, one
should generally treat it with the same high level of taste you treat
the final code with.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-30 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-27 22:34 Linux 2.6.32-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2009-09-27 23:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-27 23:48 ` Diego Calleja
2009-09-27 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-28 0:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-28 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-28 15:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-28 17:15 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-09-28 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-28 20:56 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-09-29 20:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-29 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-29 21:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 15:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 15:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 15:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-01 0:42 ` Yuhong Bao
2009-09-30 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 16:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 16:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 18:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 22:03 ` [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-01 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-01 5:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-01 6:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 6:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-01 6:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 6:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-01 7:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-10-01 6:49 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Don't generate cmpxchg8b_emu if CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG64=y tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-10-01 6:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Optimize cmpxchg64() at build-time some more tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2009-10-02 16:40 ` [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes Yuhong Bao
2009-10-01 6:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 16:14 ` Linux 2.6.32-rc1 Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-30 16:55 ` Stefan Richter
2009-09-30 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 17:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-09-30 19:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 20:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 20:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-01 7:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 19:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] x86: Provide an alternative() based cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 19:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched_clock: Fix atomicity/continuity bug by using cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 19:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 19:39 ` tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 20:19 ` Linux 2.6.32-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 20:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 20:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-09-30 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-30 21:53 ` David Miller
2009-10-01 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-01 16:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-05 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-30 20:40 ` [tip:sched/urgent] x86: Provide an alternative() based cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-30 20:40 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched_clock: Fix atomicity/continuity bug by using cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 20:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] x86: Provide an alternative() based cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 20:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched_clock: Fix atomicity/continuity bug by using cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-09-30 21:00 ` [tip:sched/urgent] x86: Provide an alternative() based cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 21:01 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched_clock: Fix atomicity/continuity bug by using cmpxchg64() tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2009-10-05 16:00 ` [PATCH] x86: Generate cmpxchg build failures Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-05 18:51 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2009-10-05 19:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-05 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-05 20:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-09 14:23 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-28 14:34 ` Linux 2.6.32-rc1 compile error Wolfgang Erig
2009-09-28 15:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-09-28 15:32 ` Wolfgang Erig
2009-09-28 16:25 ` [PATCH] isdn: fix netjet/isdnhdlc build errors Randy Dunlap
2009-09-28 19:47 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-28 22:10 Linux 2.6.32-rc1 devzero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090930210054.GD24862@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).