From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers-core: nullify private pointer on device-release
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:15:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001141524.GA3355@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910011533220.4408@axis700.grange>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:45:56PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 10:02:08AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Device structures can be reused over multiple device_add / device_release
> > > cycles.
> >
> > They shouldn't be as they should be dynamic, not static.
>
> Should they? I'm pretty sure this is not the first time this comes up -
> there are several drivers and / or subsystems, that re-use driver objects.
Then those drivers and subsystems should be fixed, as that is incorrect.
> But finding in mail archives wouldn't be very easy. And it worked until
> now - why should we break it?
I would argue that this code was always broken.
When did this problem show up for you?
> > What device is having this problem?
>
> My problem case is the soc-camera framework. There device struct is
> embedded into the video client object, which are kept as long as the
> driver is loaded.
struct device is a dynamic structure, it is supposed to be able to be
freed when the last reference goes away. Static struct device usage is
wrong. It sounds like the video client object code is incorrect, please
fix it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 8:02 [PATCH] drivers-core: nullify private pointer on device-release Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-01 13:27 ` Greg KH
2009-10-01 13:45 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-01 14:15 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-10-01 14:28 ` Kay Sievers
2009-10-05 8:11 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-05 16:03 ` Greg KH
2009-10-05 16:14 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-10-05 16:30 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091001141524.GA3355@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox