From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Abbott <michael@araneidae.co.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johan van Baarlen <jf@vanbaarlen.demon.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [GIT PULL] cputime tree
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:31:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001223105.GF28208@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0909242047280.7033@venus.araneidae.co.uk>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:49:10PM +0100, Michael Abbott wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:31:36 +0200 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Linus,
> > >
> > > with git commit 79741dd "idle cputime accounting" the semantic
> > > of the stime field of the idle processes has changed. It used to
> > > contain the amount of time the idle process has been scheduled.
> > > Since git commit 79741dd is contains the cpu time spent in the
> > > system by the idle process.
> > >
> > > This change broke the output of second field of /proc/uptime. On
> > > systems without VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING the field is always zero.
> > > The legacy output of the field is the amount of time the idle
> > > process has been scheduled on cpu #0. It is good enough to
> > > calculate the load on an uni-processor system, it is useless
> > > on a multi-processor. To restore the legacy behaviour and give
> > > meaning to the multi-processor case the best we could come up
> > > with is to add the idle time over all cpus. That fixes uni-
> > > processors systems and gives a defined semantic on smp.
> > >
> > > So please pull from 'cputime' branch of
> > >
> > > git://git390.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git cputime
> > >
> > > to receive the following updates:
> > >
> > > Michael Abbott (1):
> > > Fix idle time field in /proc/uptime
> > >
> > > fs/proc/uptime.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/proc/uptime.c b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> > > index 0c10a0b..766b1d4 100644
> > > --- a/fs/proc/uptime.c
> > > +++ b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> > > @@ -4,13 +4,18 @@
> > > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > > #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> > > #include <linux/time.h>
> > > +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> > > #include <asm/cputime.h>
> > >
> > > static int uptime_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> > > {
> > > struct timespec uptime;
> > > struct timespec idle;
> > > - cputime_t idletime = cputime_add(init_task.utime, init_task.stime);
> > > + int i;
> > > + cputime_t idletime = cputime_zero;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > > + idletime = cputime64_add(idletime, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.idle);
> > >
> > > do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
> > > monotonic_to_bootbased(&uptime);
> >
> > This is a regression fix, iirc? One which is applicable for several
> > 2.6.x kernel versions?
>
> Yes indeed, all since the regression was introduced I think around about
> .28 (though I seem to remember having to tweak the code a little when
> rebasing it forward).
Thanks, I've queued this up for .30 and .31 stable kernels.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-24 11:31 [GIT PULL] cputime tree Martin Schwidefsky
2009-09-24 16:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-24 19:49 ` Michael Abbott
2009-10-01 22:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091001223105.GF28208@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=jf@vanbaarlen.demon.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@araneidae.co.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox