public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: Don't update superblock write time when filesystem is read-only
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:01:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091005140118.GD13512@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005122409.GC8388@duck.suse.cz>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:24:09PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 03-10-09 23:12:38, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > This avoids updating the superblock write time when we are mounting
> > the root file system read/only but we need to replay the journal; at
> > that point, for people who are east of GMT and who make their clock
> > tick in localtime for Windows bug-for-bug compatibility, and this will
> > cause e2fsck to complain and force a full file system check.
>   Thanks, the patch is queued in my queue already. I just held it for a
> while because Eric also had a valid point - maybe fsck is too strict when
> it forces a full filesystem check just because the superblock write time is
> in future? On a pc-class hw, clocks go often wrong. Even I remember setting
> system clock on my desktop a few hours back because it just gets out of
> sync and I don't run NTP...
>   So I'm not against your patch because it can help in some cases and
> it's not a big deal but I think a proper fix would be in fsck...

Regardless of whether fsck relaxes its check, if the filesystem is
mounted read-only, I don't think the last write time should change...

		     	   	     	  - Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-05 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-04  3:12 [PATCH] ext3: Don't update superblock write time when filesystem is read-only Theodore Ts'o
2009-10-05 12:24 ` Jan Kara
2009-10-05 14:01   ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-10-05 14:55     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091005140118.GD13512@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox