linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Ulrich Lukas <stellplatz-nr.13a@datenparkplatz.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp,
	dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	righi.andrea@gmail.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, agk@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	jmarchan@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	riel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Do we support ioprio on SSDs with NCQ (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:41:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006084120.GJ5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e5e476b0910051409x33f8365flf32e8e7548d72e79@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> Moreover, I suggest removing also the slice_resid part, since its
> >> semantics doesn't seem consistent.
> >> When computed, it is not the residency, but the remaining time slice.
> >
> > It stands for residual, not residency.  Make more sense?
> It makes sense when computed, but not when used in rb_key computation.
> Why should we postpone queues that where preempted, instead of giving
> them a boost?

We should not, if it is/was working correctly, it should allow both for
increase/descrease of tree position (hence it's a long and can go
negative) to account for both over and under time.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-02 10:55 IO scheduler based IO controller V10 Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-02 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 15:27   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 15:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 15:32     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-02 15:40       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 16:03         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-02 16:50         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-02 19:58           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-02 22:14             ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-02 22:27               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-03 12:43                 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-03 13:38                   ` Do we support ioprio on SSDs with NCQ (Was: Re: IO scheduler based IO controller V10) Vivek Goyal
2009-10-04  9:15                     ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-04 12:11                       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-10-04 12:46                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-04 16:20                           ` Fabio Checconi
2009-10-05 21:21                             ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-05 15:06                           ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-05 21:09                             ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-06  8:41                               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-10-06  9:00                                 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-10-06 18:53                                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 21:36                           ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091006084120.GJ5216@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=stellplatz-nr.13a@datenparkplatz.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).