From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Latest vfs scalability patch
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:26:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006102604.GN5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091006101414.GM5216@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Oct 06 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Several people have been interested to test my vfs patches, so rather
> > than resend patches I have uploaded a rollup against Linus's current
> > head.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/patches/fs-scale/
> >
> > I have used ext2,ext3,autofs4,nfs as well as in-memory filesystems
> > OK (although this doesn't mean there are no bugs!). Otherwise, if your
> > filesystem compiles, then there is a reasonable chance of it working,
> > or ask me and I can try updating it for the new locking.
> >
> > I would be interested in seeing any numbers people might come up with,
> > including single-threaded performance.
>
> I gave this a quick spin on the 64-thread nehalem. Just a simple dbench
> with 64 clients on tmpfs. The results are below. While running perf top
> -a in mainline, the top 5 entries are:
>
> 2086691.00 - 96.6% : _spin_lock
> 14866.00 - 0.7% : copy_user_generic_string
> 5710.00 - 0.3% : mutex_spin_on_owner
> 2837.00 - 0.1% : _atomic_dec_and_lock
> 2274.00 - 0.1% : __d_lookup
>
> Uhm auch... It doesn't look much prettier for the patch kernel, though:
>
> 9396422.00 - 95.7% : _spin_lock
> 66978.00 - 0.7% : copy_user_generic_string
> 43775.00 - 0.4% : dput
> 23946.00 - 0.2% : __link_path_walk
> 17699.00 - 0.2% : path_init
> 15046.00 - 0.2% : do_lookup
I did a quick perf analysis on that, but only on 8 clients (64 clients
basically causes perf to shit itself, it's just not functional). So for
a 8 client 60s dbench run, we're already into ~75% spinlock time. The
components are:
dput (44%)
path_put
path_walk
do_path_lookup
path_get (44%)
path_init
do_path_lookup
__d_path (7%)
vfsmount_read_lock (3%)
This is for the patched kernel.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-06 6:49 Latest vfs scalability patch Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 10:14 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 10:26 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-10-06 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-06 12:51 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 12:26 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-06 12:49 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 8:58 ` [rfc][patch] store-free path walking Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 9:56 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 10:10 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12 3:58 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12 5:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-12 8:20 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-12 11:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-13 1:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-13 1:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 14:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 16:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-07 19:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 20:34 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:06 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 21:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-07 22:22 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08 7:39 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-08 13:12 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-10-09 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 17:49 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-07 16:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 12:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 13:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-08 13:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-08 18:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-09 4:04 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 8:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 9:51 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:07 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 3:50 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 6:15 ` David Miller
2009-10-09 10:40 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 11:09 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 10:44 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-09 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-09 23:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-15 10:08 ` Latest vfs scalability patch Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:39 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 10:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 10:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:23 ` Anton Blanchard
2009-10-15 11:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-10-15 11:48 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006102604.GN5216@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).