From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: find_busiest_group using lots of CPU
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:20:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006112006.GO5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091006075127.GF5216@kernel.dk>
On Tue, Oct 06 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 10:18 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I stuffed a few more SSDs into my text box. Running a simple workload
> > > that just does streaming reads from 10 processes (throughput is around
> > > 2.2GB/sec), find_busiest_group() is using > 10% of the CPU time. This is
> > > a 64 thread box.
> > >
> > > The top two profile entries are:
> > >
> > > 10.86% fio [kernel] [k] find_busiest_group
> > > |
> > > |--99.91%-- thread_return
> > > | io_schedule
> > > | sys_io_getevents
> > > | system_call_fastpath
> > > | 0x7f4b50b61604
> > > | |
> > > | --100.00%-- td_io_getevents
> > > | io_u_queued_complete
> > > | thread_main
> > > | run_threads
> > > | main
> > > | __libc_start_main
> > > --0.09%-- [...]
> > >
> > > 5.78% fio [kernel] [k] cpumask_next_and
> > > |
> > > |--67.21%-- thread_return
> > > | io_schedule
> > > | sys_io_getevents
> > > | system_call_fastpath
> > > | 0x7f4b50b61604
> > > | |
> > > | --100.00%-- td_io_getevents
> > > | io_u_queued_complete
> > > | thread_main
> > > | run_threads
> > > | main
> > > | __libc_start_main
> > > |
> > > --32.79%-- find_busiest_group
> > > thread_return
> > > io_schedule
> > > sys_io_getevents
> > > system_call_fastpath
> > > 0x7f4b50b61604
> > > |
> > > --100.00%-- td_io_getevents
> > > io_u_queued_complete
> > > thread_main
> > > run_threads
> > > main
> > > __libc_start_main
> > >
> > > This is with SCHED_DEBUG=y and SCHEDSTATS=y enabled, I just tried with
> > > both disabled but that yields the same result (well actually worse, 22%
> > > spent in there. dunno if that's normal "fluctuation"). GROUP_SCHED is
> > > not set. This seems way excessive!
> >
> > io_schedule() straight into find_busiest_group() leads me to think this
> > could be SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE, does something like:
> >
> > for i in /proc/sys/kernel/sched_domain/cpu*/domain*/flags;
> > do
> > val=`cat $i`; echo $((val & ~0x02)) > $i;
> > done
> >
> > [ assuming SCHED_DEBUG=y ]
> >
> > Cure things?
>
> I can try, as mentioned it doesn't look any better with SCHED_DEBUG=n
It does, it's gone from the profiles.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-06 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 8:18 find_busiest_group using lots of CPU Jens Axboe
2009-10-05 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-06 7:51 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 11:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-10-06 11:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-06 11:56 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-06 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-06 12:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091006112006.GO5216@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox