public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: zach.brown@oracle.com, linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [more performance numbers]
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:06:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006180628.GB5216@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49eipga02o.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 06 2009, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Here's a mail I got from Nathan Roberts.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jeff
> 
> ---
> 
> Similar test as before. I had to re-upload the files so comparing
> against last time isn't really apples-apples.
> 
> Disk is a cciss logical drive consisting of 12 SATA drives in a RAID6
> configuration with 128K stripes.
> 
> Test case 1 is to read 1 million random 40K files (no file is read
> more than once), 16 4K iocbs at a time, 100 threads.
> 
> Test case 2 is the same except 100,000 128K files are read.
> 
> Unit of measure is "files read per second".
> 
> 
> 40K
> -------------------------------------------------
> Kernel                              NOOP
> ------                              ----
> 2.6.30.5                            682
> 2.6.30.5 (w/o drop_caches)          718
> 2.6.30.5+patch_v4                   900
> 2.6.30.5+patch_v4 (w/o drop caches) 965
> 
> 
> 128K
> -------------------------------------------------
> Kernel                              NOOP
> ------                              ----
> 2.6.30.5                            242
> 2.6.30.5 (w/o drop_caches)          350
> 2.6.30.5+patch_v4                   292
> 2.6.30.5+patch_v4 (w/o drop caches) 420

Nice numbers! The patch looks good to me from a quick look, if you want
I can throw it into the testing mix tomorrow and see what kind of
improvements I see here. With performance increase of that magnitude, we
should get it in sooner rather than later.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-02 22:54 [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:56 ` [patch v4 1/2] block: get rid of the WRITE_ODIRECT flag Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:57 ` [patch v4 2/2] aio: implement request batching Jeff Moyer
2009-10-02 22:58 ` [patch v4 0/3] " Jeff Moyer
2009-10-06 17:45 ` [patch v4 0/3] aio: implement request batching [more performance numbers] Jeff Moyer
2009-10-06 18:06   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-10-06 18:18     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-07 10:52       ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-07 12:09         ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-27 16:16         ` Jeff Moyer
2009-10-28  8:28           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091006180628.GB5216@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox