From: cl@linux-foundation.org
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: [this_cpu_xx V6 6/7] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:10:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091007211053.187155632@gentwo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091007211024.442168959@gentwo.org
[-- Attachment #1: this_cpu_slub_cleanup_stat --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5136 bytes --]
this_cpu_inc() translates into a single instruction on x86 and does not
need any register. So use it in stat(). We also want to avoid the
calculation of the per cpu kmem_cache_cpu structure pointer. So pass
a kmem_cache pointer instead of a kmem_cache_cpu pointer.
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org?
---
mm/slub.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c 2009-09-29 11:44:35.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2009-09-29 11:44:49.000000000 -0500
@@ -217,10 +217,10 @@ static inline void sysfs_slab_remove(str
#endif
-static inline void stat(struct kmem_cache_cpu *c, enum stat_item si)
+static inline void stat(struct kmem_cache *s, enum stat_item si)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_STATS
- c->stat[si]++;
+ __this_cpu_inc(s->cpu_slab->stat[si]);
#endif
}
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct
if (!page)
return NULL;
- stat(this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab), ORDER_FALLBACK);
+ stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
}
if (kmemcheck_enabled
@@ -1406,23 +1406,22 @@ static struct page *get_partial(struct k
static void unfreeze_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int tail)
{
struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
- struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
__ClearPageSlubFrozen(page);
if (page->inuse) {
if (page->freelist) {
add_partial(n, page, tail);
- stat(c, tail ? DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL : DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
+ stat(s, tail ? DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL : DEACTIVATE_TO_HEAD);
} else {
- stat(c, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
+ stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
if (SLABDEBUG && PageSlubDebug(page) &&
(s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER))
add_full(n, page);
}
slab_unlock(page);
} else {
- stat(c, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
+ stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
if (n->nr_partial < s->min_partial) {
/*
* Adding an empty slab to the partial slabs in order
@@ -1438,7 +1437,7 @@ static void unfreeze_slab(struct kmem_ca
slab_unlock(page);
} else {
slab_unlock(page);
- stat(__this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab), FREE_SLAB);
+ stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
discard_slab(s, page);
}
}
@@ -1453,7 +1452,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_
int tail = 1;
if (page->freelist)
- stat(c, DEACTIVATE_REMOTE_FREES);
+ stat(s, DEACTIVATE_REMOTE_FREES);
/*
* Merge cpu freelist into slab freelist. Typically we get here
* because both freelists are empty. So this is unlikely
@@ -1479,7 +1478,7 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_
static inline void flush_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
{
- stat(c, CPUSLAB_FLUSH);
+ stat(s, CPUSLAB_FLUSH);
slab_lock(c->page);
deactivate_slab(s, c);
}
@@ -1619,7 +1618,7 @@ static void *__slab_alloc(struct kmem_ca
if (unlikely(!node_match(c, node)))
goto another_slab;
- stat(c, ALLOC_REFILL);
+ stat(s, ALLOC_REFILL);
load_freelist:
object = c->page->freelist;
@@ -1634,7 +1633,7 @@ load_freelist:
c->node = page_to_nid(c->page);
unlock_out:
slab_unlock(c->page);
- stat(c, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
+ stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
return object;
another_slab:
@@ -1644,7 +1643,7 @@ new_slab:
new = get_partial(s, gfpflags, node);
if (new) {
c->page = new;
- stat(c, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
+ stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
goto load_freelist;
}
@@ -1658,7 +1657,7 @@ new_slab:
if (new) {
c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
- stat(c, ALLOC_SLAB);
+ stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
if (c->page)
flush_slab(s, c);
slab_lock(new);
@@ -1713,7 +1712,7 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(
else {
c->freelist = get_freepointer(s, object);
- stat(c, ALLOC_FASTPATH);
+ stat(s, ALLOC_FASTPATH);
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -1780,10 +1779,8 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cach
{
void *prior;
void **object = (void *)x;
- struct kmem_cache_cpu *c;
- c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
- stat(c, FREE_SLOWPATH);
+ stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
slab_lock(page);
if (unlikely(SLABDEBUG && PageSlubDebug(page)))
@@ -1796,7 +1793,7 @@ checks_ok:
page->inuse--;
if (unlikely(PageSlubFrozen(page))) {
- stat(c, FREE_FROZEN);
+ stat(s, FREE_FROZEN);
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -1809,7 +1806,7 @@ checks_ok:
*/
if (unlikely(!prior)) {
add_partial(get_node(s, page_to_nid(page)), page, 1);
- stat(c, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
+ stat(s, FREE_ADD_PARTIAL);
}
out_unlock:
@@ -1822,10 +1819,10 @@ slab_empty:
* Slab still on the partial list.
*/
remove_partial(s, page);
- stat(c, FREE_REMOVE_PARTIAL);
+ stat(s, FREE_REMOVE_PARTIAL);
}
slab_unlock(page);
- stat(c, FREE_SLAB);
+ stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
discard_slab(s, page);
return;
@@ -1863,7 +1860,7 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(st
if (likely(page == c->page && c->node >= 0)) {
set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
c->freelist = object;
- stat(c, FREE_FASTPATH);
+ stat(s, FREE_FASTPATH);
} else
__slab_free(s, page, x, addr);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-07 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 21:10 [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic cl
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 1/7] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion cl
2009-10-08 10:38 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-08 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-08 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-08 10:53 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 2/7] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier cl
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 3/7] Use this_cpu operations in slub cl
2009-10-12 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 14:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 2:13 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-13 14:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 14:56 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-13 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 1:57 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-14 14:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-15 7:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-16 16:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-18 3:11 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 4/7] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation cl
2009-10-13 18:48 ` [FIX] patch "SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation" Christoph Lameter
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 5/7] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields cl
2009-10-07 23:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-07 21:10 ` cl [this message]
2009-10-07 21:10 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 7/7] this_cpu: slub aggressive use of this_cpu operations in the hotpaths cl
2009-10-12 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-10-12 13:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-12 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 9:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 19:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 19:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-13 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 20:15 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 20:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 22:53 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-14 13:34 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-14 14:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-14 15:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-14 15:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 16:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-10-14 18:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-16 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-16 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-15 9:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-16 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-16 18:43 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-16 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 20:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-14 1:33 ` David Rientjes
2009-10-13 15:40 ` [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic Mel Gorman
2009-10-13 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-13 16:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-10-13 17:17 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091007211053.187155632@gentwo.org \
--to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox