linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:31:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910101031.15620.thomas.schlichter@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD00C89.3000503@linux.intel.com>

Am Samstag 10 Oktober 2009 06:24:41 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've found a problem with X.org not setting up MTRR for the framebuffer
> > memory. After I investigated I think this is not a X.org problem, but a
> > kernel issue.
> 
> is there any CPU left that does not support PAT ?
> 
> eg in other words, should we try instead to get PAT working for you?

Hmm, my CPU (VIA Nano) seems to support PAT, but Ubuntu disables this
feature in its kernel config. I'm using 9.04, but even 9.10 will have PAT
disabled:

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
karmic.git;a=blob;f=debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu;h=a43cbabd02bfdf5412de6fea232db86aa5d3e742;hb=HEAD

The patch I sent does nothing if PAT is enabled, so it should be quite
safe for this case. And for the case when PAT is not enabled, it simply
tries to set up MTRR entries, if this fails it will still behave like
it does today...

So, convincing Ubuntu to enable PAT would be a workaround, but I think
the problem would still exist and should be fixed.

Kind regards,
  Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-10  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-10  1:22 [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10  4:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10  8:31   ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2009-10-10 15:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10 17:50       ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-11  7:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-11  9:56       ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-11 18:51   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-11 18:54     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-11 20:19       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-12 18:09         ` Robert Hancock
     [not found] <200910122032.52168.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2009-10-12 19:16 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-10-12 19:45   ` Thomas Schlichter
     [not found]     ` <1255378684.2063.5.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
2009-10-13 21:05       ` Thomas Schlichter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-13  7:34 Jan Beulich
2009-10-13 21:29 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-14  8:13   ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-14 19:14     ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-15  7:48       ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-17 19:48         ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19  9:16           ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-19 13:44             ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-19 13:54               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 13:36           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-10-19 14:47 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 19:54 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 11:57   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 14:59 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 21:49   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-20 20:35   ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 21:59     ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 11:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 15:07 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:10 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 13:45 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-21 17:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 20:01     ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22  9:53       ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 15:34         ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-22 21:47           ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 23:10             ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23  0:11               ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23  1:53                 ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-23  4:31                   ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23  4:58                     ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23  7:24                       ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-23 14:24                         ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23 14:37                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23  4:33                   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 14:38 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-22 12:08 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 12:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-22 13:26   ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 13:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 14:27 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 14:41 Thomas Schlichter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910101031.15620.thomas.schlichter@web.de \
    --to=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).